2019
DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lengthening With Monolateral External Fixation Versus Magnetically Motorized Intramedullary Nail in Congenital Femoral Deficiency

Abstract: Level IV-therapeutic.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
68
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
12
68
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all of the papers accurately reported the indications for surgical intervention and the surgical technique (respectively 5 points each). Studies by Szymczuk et al [ 30 ] and Hammouda et al [ 32 ] compared the PRECICE intramedullary nailing with external fixation, but in our analysis, we only took into account the PRECICE nailing results. In studies by Nasto et al [ 27 ] and Iliadis et al [ 29 ], both retrograde and antegrade approaches were used, and some tibia nailing was included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, all of the papers accurately reported the indications for surgical intervention and the surgical technique (respectively 5 points each). Studies by Szymczuk et al [ 30 ] and Hammouda et al [ 32 ] compared the PRECICE intramedullary nailing with external fixation, but in our analysis, we only took into account the PRECICE nailing results. In studies by Nasto et al [ 27 ] and Iliadis et al [ 29 ], both retrograde and antegrade approaches were used, and some tibia nailing was included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean follow-up was 1.7 years when reported (Table 1 ). Concerning surgical indications, one study only focused on a single pathology; in particular, Szymczuk et al [ 30 ] focused on congenital femoral deficiency treatment for a total of 30 femurs (Table 2 ). Among other papers, the principal surgical indication was congenital femoral deficiency (19 femurs), and yet post-traumatic malformations (18 femurs), achondroplasia (8 femurs), hemihypertrophy (8 femurs) and Ollier disease (6 femurs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with an unstable knee due to congenital deficiencies are exposed to a risk of knee dislocation (Shabtai et al 2014, Black et al 2015, Szymczuk et al 2019. Despite 6 of our 10 patients having a congenital deficiency, no knee dislocation was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Fully implantable intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) with mechanical (Guichet andCasar 1997, Cole et al 2001) and motorized (Baumgart et al 1997, Schiedel et al 2014 drive systems have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for bone lengthening (Mahboubian et al 2012, Black et al 2015, Laubscher et al 2016. Recently, magnetically driven ILNs in particular have become increasingly popular (Kirane et al 2014, Wagner et al 2017 and in contrast to external fixation provide an equally safe and more comfortable option for limb lengthening and deformity correction (Szymczuk et al 2019, Horn et al 2019. Antegrade or retrograde femoral and antegrade tibial lengthening with the PRECICE limb lengthening system (NuVasive, San Diego, CA, USA) has been assessed by several studies (Kirane et al 2014, Schiedel et al 2014, Shabtai et al 2014, Tiefenboeck et al 2016, Wiebking et al 2016, Fragomen and Rozbruch 2017, Wagner et al 2017, Iobst et al 2018, Cosic and Edwards 2020, Nasto et al 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the complications reported in small series of patients, the new technology of motorized intramedullary nails (MIMN) has simplified upper limb lengthening surgery and made lower limb lengthening more comfortable for patients[ 53 ]. Monolateral EF lengthening was compared with MIMN lengthening in children with congenital femoral deficiency and similar lengthening parameters[ 54 ]. The MIMN group had lower complication rates and better range of motion at the end of distraction and at consolidation.…”
Section: Current Clinical Practice and Research In The Ilizarov Techniques Of Bone Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%