1973
DOI: 10.2113/gssgfbull.s7-xv.3-4.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les granitoides varisques de la Meseta iberique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This feature has been classically interpreted as the result of their emplacement having occurred at deeper crustal levels than that of the younger granitoid groups (Capdevila et al, 1973;Bellido Mulas et al, 1987). Figure 2 is a simplified geological map of northwest Iberia showing the plutons dated in this study and the location of each sample.…”
Section: Main Features Of the Ecs Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). This feature has been classically interpreted as the result of their emplacement having occurred at deeper crustal levels than that of the younger granitoid groups (Capdevila et al, 1973;Bellido Mulas et al, 1987). Figure 2 is a simplified geological map of northwest Iberia showing the plutons dated in this study and the location of each sample.…”
Section: Main Features Of the Ecs Granitoidsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A third suite of Variscan granitoids (the object of this study), putatively older than the syntectonic leucogranitoids, was postulated in the early works of Den Tex (1966), Capdevila (1969), and Capdevila et al (1973), based mainly on the presence of a tectonic foliation and a more mafic composition than that of the synextensional granitoids. They are commonly labeled Granodioritas precoces (early granodiorites), following De Pablo Maciá (1981) and González Lodeiro et al (1984), and were interpreted as being deeper seated intrusions than the POS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Desde la década de los setenta, y en paralelo a los estudios locales, comienzan a elaborarse síntesis regionales sobre los materiales ígneo-metamórficos del Sistema Central, destacando las revisiones realizadas por: Bard et al (1970), Bischoff (1972), Capdevila et al (1973), Aparicio et al (1975, Capote et al (1977, Bellido et al (1981), , García Cacho y Aparicio (1987), y Villaseca et al (1993). Trabajos de síntesis podrían considerarse igualmente las memorias y mapas geológicos, tanto a escala 1:200.000 como a escala 1:50.000, que se publican a inicios de la década de 1980de (IGME, 1981ade y 1981bArribas y Jiménez, 1982) Capote (1991); Marín y Campos (1992); Rivas et al (1993);Campos Egea et al (1995);Hernán (1996);y Pérez et al (2001).…”
Section: Antecedentes Recientes (1939-actualidad)unclassified
“…According to their chemical and mineralogical composition, the variscan granitoids can be grouped into two families: peraluminous, two-mica granites and leucogranites and biotite (± Crd ± Hnb) granodiorites. The widespread occurrence of Crdbearing granites has led some petrologists to suggest an intermediate series or family of "granites of mixed features" (Capdevila et al, 1973;García-Moreno et al, 2007). Most of leucogranites are related to the principal metamorphic episodes and their emplacement is associated with the last deformation phase (D 3 ) and the development of ductile extensional shear zones (Ferreira et al, 1987;Escuder Viruete et al, 1994;Díez Balda et al, 1995;Valle Aguado et al, 2005;Azevedo & Valle Aguado, 2013).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%