Les maires face aux plans de prévention du risque inondation (Ppri)

Douvinet, Johnny; Defossez, Stéphanie; Anselle, Arnaud; Denolle, Anne-Sophie

doi:10.3917/eg.401.0031

Cited by 47 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the time, the absence of severe events during several years causes oblivion of the natural hazards and so the public authorities tend to not take into account in their decision concerning the urbanism [14]. It is not until the occurrence of dramatic events to give an impulsion for the enforcement of prevention policy in a territory: 1999 in the Aude; 2002 in the Gard, 2010 in the Var.…”

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Sallèles-G ¶$XGH impacted by the flood in 1999, the owners first complied with the PPR prescriptions consisting in particular to leave the ground floor free of occupation. But, little by little, the ground floor has been used again and sometimes rather quickly after the flood, 4 years after [14]. The vulnerability comes also from the non-compliance of the owners with the PPR prescriptions, because the damages are mostly compensated thanks to the insurance mechanism.…”

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The local development is a quotidian concern but not the management of natural hazards. The delay for a PPR project to be approved allows the Mayors negotiating the delineation of the zoning, putting in the balance the economic development and the attractiveness of the territory [14]. The floodplain development brings a sort of ³UHZDUGV´ a private profit for individuals through increased land values and higher levels of property-based community taxes for local government, derived from increased employment, regeneration and other local economic change [7].…”

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The problems of the late implementation of the legal prevention measures for flood risk

Sanseverino-Godfrin

2016

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Three main laws, 13th July 1982, 2nd February 1995 and 30th July 2003, have reformed the French legal framework and introduced special measures to prevent flood risks. Besides, completing these measures, the urban planning law have imposed since the 1987 Law that the urban planning documents have had to take into account the natural hazards to define the buildable areas. But, the late implementation of the prevention provisions and the lack of the urban planning documents concerning the natural hazards have led to a development of the urbanism in the flood prone areas. As consequences, most of the constructions are not flood proof, and many large damages are caused each time a flood occurs. We present this problematic through 8 municipalities in three departments (Aude, Gard, and Var).

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion Of the Results And Main Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The problems of the late implementation of the legal prevention measures for flood risk

Sanseverino-Godfrin

2016

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In general, local authorities and residents consider the Risk Prevention Plans (PPRs) to be a constraint [3,6,13,14]. Regulations can affect local development and home sales, which makes it difficult for the PPR to gain acceptance and casts doubt on its effectiveness and relevance.…”

Section: Mitigation Influenced By Experience More Than By Regulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flood risk management: cases studies in French Mediterranean area

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. For a long time, flood risk management in France was oriented around controlling the hazard with the installation of structural measures such as dikes. Since the 1990s, however, numerous events have shown that these measures are not always effective. As a result, institutions now consider that other actions, such as preventive measures, are possible. Risk management is based on public policies and involves a number of players, as well as the societies exposed to the risks. The goal of our study is to show the various orientations of risk management by looking at several examples from Mediterranean France, where flash floods are common, in particular using postevent analysis. Post-event observations let us evaluate the effectiveness of flood-management methods. Do public policies work, and do they have a real influence on reducing deaths and damage? Are individual measures overtaking collective ones? The main results of our study show that the event itself is more important in determining which measures are applied than public policies, which do not take into account local specificities.

show abstract

“…Cependant, il peut être utile aux décideurs de voir éclairer leurs décisions par des études montrant la contribution à la vulnérabilité globale de chacun des paramètres qui la composent (Renard et Chapon, 2010). En effet, la prévention des risques constitue, pour les élus locaux notamment, une difficulté essentielle car ils subissent de nombreuses pressions liées aux tensions sur le marché foncier et à l'impératif de développement socioéconomique de leur commune (Douvinet et al, 2011). Par ailleurs, les choix politiques de localisation des enjeux (constructions nouvelles par exemple) et de gestion des risques (mise en place des Plans de prévention des risques littoraux, attribution des permis de construire, etc.)…”

unclassified

Perceptions du risque de submersion marine par la population du littoral languedocien : contribution à l’analyse de la vulnérabilité côtière

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dans cet article sont présentés les résultats d'une enquête sur la perception du risque de submersion marine par les populations dans trois communes languedociennes. Il en ressort un certain paradoxe entre l'importance des dégâts que les enquêtés prévoient au niveau de l'ensemble du territoire et la relative confiance qu'ils ont pour ce qui les concerne directement. Sur ce thème encore relativement peu exploré malgré son actualité, cette contribution propose un regard original en comparant les perceptions de différentes catégories sociales comme les résidents permanents ou secondaires et les commerçants. La RédactionRésumé -Cet article traite de vulnérabilité littorale face au risque de submersion marine. Cette vulnérabilité est divisée en quatre composantes : les aléas (phénomènes météorologiques, changement climatique, etc.), les enjeux (valorisation des biens marchands et non marchands, etc.), la gestion (politiques publiques de prévention et de réparation) et la perception des risques. Cette dernière traduit la position de chacun des différents acteurs, le degré de conscience des risques chez les habitants, leur réaction potentielle en cas de sinistre, etc. Les résultats analysés ici sont ceux d'une enquête réalisée en 2009 auprès des résidents et commerçants de trois communes du littoral languedocien. De manière générale, le risque de submersion s'avère peu redouté par les enquêtés, plutôt confiants quant à leur avenir résidentiel dans la zone. En fait, il existe une forte distorsion entre les dommages qu'ils anticipent pour l'ensemble du territoire, qu'ils jugent potentiellement très importants, et ceux qu'ils imaginent, avec beaucoup plus d'optimisme, pour leurs propres biens. Abstract -Risk perception of coastal flooding and coastal vulnerability: an example from Languedoc (France).Our research approach to vulnerability is based on four main components: hazards (marinemeteorological factors and climate change, geomorphological processes, etc.), assets at stake (identification and valuation, market and non market goods, damage valuation, etc.), management (public prevention and restoration policies), and perception of risk. Risk perception is a central feature in systemic vulnerability evaluation as it provides invaluable information on the diversity of stakeholder viewpoints, the degree of awareness and susceptibility of the exposed inhabitants, their attachment to the territory, their response to the hazard, etc. and thus gives indications on their adaptation capacity. Our paper analyzes the results of a wide survey of 563 inhabitants of a low and very urbanized stretch of the French Mediterranean coast (Palavas zone, Hérault) conducted in 2009, before the Xynthia storm. Results show, for example, that when respondents were asked to choose from a wide range of risks of all types, they expressed greater fears regarding non-environmental risks. When we concentrated on environmental risks and asked the respondents to choose the three they considered to be the most important for their Natures Sciences Socié...

show abstract

Les maires face aux plans de prévention du risque inondation (Ppri)

Cited by 47 publications

References 8 publications

The problems of the late implementation of the legal prevention measures for flood risk

The problems of the late implementation of the legal prevention measures for flood risk

Flood risk management: cases studies in French Mediterranean area

Perceptions du risque de submersion marine par la population du littoral languedocien : contribution à l’analyse de la vulnérabilité côtière

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About