2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the assumption of a constant stress field, strain represents a relative stiffness or elasticity distribution 15 of the compressed tissue. Various strain estimation methods have been developed for elastography, most of which fall into two categories: gradient-based strain estimator [4,9,10] and direct strain estimator [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the assumption of a constant stress field, strain represents a relative stiffness or elasticity distribution 15 of the compressed tissue. Various strain estimation methods have been developed for elastography, most of which fall into two categories: gradient-based strain estimator [4,9,10] and direct strain estimator [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimators of this kind employ global or local adaptive scaling of the post-compressed signal to estimate strain directly from the stretching factor 50 [11,12]. The stretching factor maximizing the cross-correlation coefficient between the pre-and post-compressed signal segments can be used to calculate strain directly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%