Lessons from the recent economic crisis: the Australian household stimulus package

Martorano, Bruno

doi:10.1080/02692171.2014.983052

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding is particularly important given the substantially higher rates of pre-existing precarity experienced by visa-holders, a group that was excluded from JobKeeper and JobSeeker payments. While research has often identified the protective impact of welfare payments on financial resilience following a disaster,39 40 this finding is a rare contribution to the literature on the impact of welfare payments on mental health. In contrast, we find that social networks do mediate the relationship between precarity and mental health reduction, but not to a statistically significant degree.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of COVID-19 shocks, precarity and mediating resources on the mental health of residents of share housing in Victoria, Australia: an analysis of data from a two-wave survey

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesCOVID-19 lockdown measures have challenged people’s mental health, especially among economically vulnerable households. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of exposure to COVID-19 shocks (defined as job loss, living cost pressures and changing housing conditions throughout the lockdown period) and double precarity (defined as precarity in housing and employment) on mental health outcomes for members of share households as well as the mediating effects of a range of resources.DesignWe conducted a two-wave survey of occupants of share housing in June and October 2020 during a prolonged period of population lockdown. Research design involved fixed effects ordered logit regression models to assess the mental health consequences of baseline precarity and COVID-related shocks.SettingVictoria, Australia.ParticipantsWe surveyed 293 occupants of share houses (mean age 34 SD 11.5, 56% female). Members of share houses (where individuals are unrelated adults and not in a romantic relationship) are more likely to be young, casually employed, visa-holders and low-income.Outcome measuresWe measured household composition, housing and employment precarity, access to government support, household crowding, social networks and COVID-19 shocks. We used a self-reported measure of mental health.ResultsThose exposed to COVID-19 shocks reported a 2.7 times higher odds of mental health deterioration (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.85). People exposed to double precarity (precarity in both housing and employment) reported 2.4 times higher odds of mental health deterioration (OR 2.4, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.69). Housing inadequacy and lack of access to sufficient government payments explained 14.7% and 7% of the total effect of double precarity on mental health, respectively.ConclusionsResults indicate that residents of group households characterised by pre-existing precarity were vulnerable to negative mental health effects during lockdown. Access to sufficient government payments and adequate housing buffered this negative effect.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%