Lessons learned from Swiss born globals entering Brazil

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to contribute to managers’ understanding of the internationalization of born global (BG) firms from developed countries in emerging markets. Adapting the new institutional sociology approach, the authors provide insights into how BGs might strive to bridge the institutional distance. Design/methodology/approach An explorative, multiple case study is used focusing on two Swiss BG firms in Brazil. Findings The study shows that these two firms faced similar institutional challenges. However, they approached them in different ways and achieved different outcomes. The comparison of these two cases highlights key factors that may influence successful internationalization, namely, niche strategies, high commitment modes of entry and the liability of outsidership. Research limitations/implications The main research implication is that the market mode of entry and high commitment entry modes are conductive to local market knowledge acquisition. Future research should investigate how western BGs might overcome the disadvantages of foreignness and effectively gain acceptance in emerging markets such as in Brazil, China or India. This could be done by looking at micro-processes, e.g. multiple identities in which BGs might strive to simultaneously fit in and stand out in the host market. Practical implications The findings, which uncover key factors that influence internationalization, shall contribute to managers’ understanding of how BG firms from developed economies enter emerging markets and overcome challenges. Originality/value Comparing these two cases highlights key factors that may shed light on the successful internationalization of BGs from developed countries in emerging markets. The authors first describe the institutional isomorphic pressures on the two Swiss BGs in Brazil. Second, the authors reveal how they engaged in isomorphic processes to bridge the institutional distance.

Smart governance strategies and their relationships with SDGs in three Latin American cities

“…Our analytical technique was based on pattern-matching and cross-case synthesis, two procedures described by Yin (2018) and Miles et al (2014) and frequently used in case studies (Kahle et al, 2020;Prystupa et al, 2019;Tabares, 2021). Pattern-matching involved identifying observed patterns in one of the selected cities and then looking for equivalent or related patterns in the other observed geographies, while cross-case synthesis included contrasting the individual cases to go beyond initial observations and identify within-group similarities and differences (Eisenhardt, 1989(Eisenhardt, , 2021Yin, 2018).…”