“…A total of 15 trials compared levosimendan with placebo, 9 trials compared levosimendan with other inotropes, including epinephrine (1 trial), dobutamine (4 trials), and milrinone (3 trials), 2 other trials compared levosimendan with nitroglycerin or with the intra‐aortic balloon pump. To minimize heterogeneity across the trials, quantitative synthesis was only performed for the 15 placebo‐controlled randomized trials …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies reported data on all‐cause mortality and the data were suitable for meta‐analysis (Figure ) . The pooled OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.55‐1.04, P = 0.09), indicating no superiority of levosimendan over placebo in terms of mortality.…”
Levosimendan did not result in a reduction in mortality in adult cardiac surgery patients. Well designed, adequately powered, multicenter trials are necessary to determine the role of levosimendan in adult cardiac surgery.
“…A total of 15 trials compared levosimendan with placebo, 9 trials compared levosimendan with other inotropes, including epinephrine (1 trial), dobutamine (4 trials), and milrinone (3 trials), 2 other trials compared levosimendan with nitroglycerin or with the intra‐aortic balloon pump. To minimize heterogeneity across the trials, quantitative synthesis was only performed for the 15 placebo‐controlled randomized trials …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven studies reported data on all‐cause mortality and the data were suitable for meta‐analysis (Figure ) . The pooled OR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.55‐1.04, P = 0.09), indicating no superiority of levosimendan over placebo in terms of mortality.…”
Levosimendan did not result in a reduction in mortality in adult cardiac surgery patients. Well designed, adequately powered, multicenter trials are necessary to determine the role of levosimendan in adult cardiac surgery.
“…Further filtering led to 60 articles scanned during the abstract review. From the 27 full‐text articles reviewed, 14 studies were finally included for systematic review and meta‐analysis . Figure depicts the flow diagram for the search process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 27 full-text articles reviewed, 14 studies were finally included for systematic review and meta-analysis. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Figure 1 depicts the flow diagram for the search process. Tables 1 and 2 present an overview and quality review of the included studies.…”
Our meta-analysis demonstrates that Levosimendan improves clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. Results of the ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trial are awaited to provide more conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of this drug.
“…The clinical benefits of using levosimendan in cardiac surgery have been demonstrated in a number of studies [1,17,[36][37][38][39][40]. In the current economic analysis, which evaluated the costs of levosimendan compared with dobutamine in patients requiring inotropic support following cardiac surgery in Germany, levosimendan was found to be cost saving from the hospital and health insurance perspectives.…”
The use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who require inotropic support appears to be cost-saving. The results of the analysis provide a strong rationale to run local clinical studies with pharmacoeconomic end-points which would allow a much more precise computation of the benefits of levosimendan.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.