Librarians and compensation negotiation in the library workplace

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to report on survey results from a study about librarians' experience with compensation (salary and benefits) negotiation in the library workplace in order to provide data that will inform professional discourse and practice.Design/methodology/approach -A primarily quantitative survey instrument was administered via Qualtrics Survey Software and distributed through listservs and social media channels representing a range of library types and sub-disciplines. The survey was explicitly addressed to librarians for participation and asked them questions related to their work history and experience with negotiating for salary and benefits.Findings -A total of 1,541 librarians completed the survey. More than half of survey respondents reported not negotiating for their current library position. The majority of those who did negotiate reported positive outcomes, including an increase in salary or total compensation package. Only a very small number of respondents reported threats to rescind or rescinded offers when negotiating for their current positions. Respondents cited prior salary and prior work experience and/or education as the top information sources informing negotiation strategy.Originality/value -There is minimal discussion of salary and benefits negotiation by individuals in the library literature and prior surveys of librarians' experience with compensation negotiation do not exist. This is the first paper that tracks negotiating practices and outcomes of librarians in library workplaces of all types. Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to report on survey results from a study about librarians' experience with compensation (salary and benefits) negotiation in the library workplace in order to provide data that will inform professional discourse and practice.Design/methodology/approach -A primarily quantitative survey instrument was administered via Qualtrics Survey Software and distributed through listservs and social media channels representing a range of library types and sub-disciplines. The survey was explicitly addressed to librarians for participation and asked them questions related to their work history and experience with negotiating for salary and benefits. Originality/value -There is minimal discussion of salary and benefits negotiation by individuals in the library literature and prior surveys of librarians' experience with compensation negotiation do not exist. This is the first paper that tracks negotiating practices and outcomes of librarians in library workplaces of all types.

Employment Negotiation Behaviours of Canadian Academic Librarians: An Exploratory Study

“…Examining responses by gender showed that 53% (n=49) of women and 78% (n=14) of men negotiated. While this trend is consistent with the findings of other studies (Farrell & Geraci, 2017;Greig, 2008), the pool of male participants was limited.…”

Employers’ Revelation of Decision-making Keys for Employing People with Visual Impairment: Mixed-method Analysis of Employers’ Motivations

“…Similarly, employers use prior salary information as an indication of a candidate's worth (Farrell et al, 2017). According to Marginal Productivity Theory, each individual gets paid based on his or her contribution to the employer's revenue (Pressman, 2014).…”