2017
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2017.1284493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Library Consortia and the CIC: Leveraging Scale for Collaborative Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors claim subscribing to individual resources can be more advantageous for the consortium as the collection can be centred on the user rather than in the publisher’s interest (Pedersen et al, 2014). This form of contract can be detrimental to the consortium, as in the case of a group of libraries with homogeneous interests, they will not benefit from the diversity of titles supplied (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013; Armstrong and Teper, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim subscribing to individual resources can be more advantageous for the consortium as the collection can be centred on the user rather than in the publisher’s interest (Pedersen et al, 2014). This form of contract can be detrimental to the consortium, as in the case of a group of libraries with homogeneous interests, they will not benefit from the diversity of titles supplied (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013; Armstrong and Teper, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several examples of library consortia that enable collaborative efforts to make available and accessible catalogs, websites, and activities from a single platform. 113 These include the Online…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature documents the history of collaboration via consortia in higher education (Bostick, 2001;Armstrong and Teper, 2017). Early consortia collaborations focused on reducing costs for member libraries, but typologies of collaboration extend from these "buying clubs" into several features shared, such as shared ILS', shared discovery systems, digital repositories, and print archives (Machovec, 2013).…”
Section: Consortia Technology: Mobile Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%