2021
DOI: 10.5935/jetia.v7i30.752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) comparison of pavements (Flexible, rigid and rigid-admixed with cow bone ASH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ketema [4], in the design life span of 40 years, rigid pavements have an adequate period, excluding maintenance and rehabilitation, which is longer than flexible pavements (37.5 and 26 years). In addition, rigid pavements also have advantages such as less hydroplaning and enhanced night vision, which serve to increase safety and reduce the number of accidents that can occur [5]. Rigid pavements are more suitable for road design with high traffic and vehicle loads [2,5,6,7], ports or airports [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Ketema [4], in the design life span of 40 years, rigid pavements have an adequate period, excluding maintenance and rehabilitation, which is longer than flexible pavements (37.5 and 26 years). In addition, rigid pavements also have advantages such as less hydroplaning and enhanced night vision, which serve to increase safety and reduce the number of accidents that can occur [5]. Rigid pavements are more suitable for road design with high traffic and vehicle loads [2,5,6,7], ports or airports [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, rigid pavements also have advantages such as less hydroplaning and enhanced night vision, which serve to increase safety and reduce the number of accidents that can occur [5]. Rigid pavements are more suitable for road design with high traffic and vehicle loads [2,5,6,7], ports or airports [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research comparing the LCC (initial construction cost, maintenance & rehabilitation (M&R) cost, and user cost) of conventional flexible pavement versus perpetual flexible pavement under varied traffic and weather situations found that perpetual flexible pavement reduces LCC by 4-20% [10]. According to research that compared the life cycle costs of conventional Portland cement concrete (PCC) and conventional bituminous pavement, the initial cost of conventional bituminous pavement is 30% cheaper than conventional PCC pavement, but the life cycle cost in terms of net present value is 46.05% greater than PCC pavement [11].HMA has a considerably higher ecological cumulative consumption ratio than PCC in terms of computation of energy and commercial energy usage, making it even more sustainable, and PCC generates roughly 2.6 times more pollutants than HMA [12].Flexible pavements, according to one research, have a lower carbon impact than rigid pavements when CO2 generated in the production of raw materials and mixtures is examined, it is significantly less than the quantity generated in the production of PCC, whereas the cement manufacturing has the biggest carbon generator in it [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%