Lifelogging: You're Wearing a Camera?

Wolf, Katrin; Schmidt, Albrecht; Bexheti, Agon; Langheinrich, Marc

doi:10.1109/mprv.2014.53

Cited by 57 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most prominent devices are probably the "Autographer" and the "Narrative Clip" [32] (left and centre images of figure 1). The Autographer was developed based on technology licensed from the SenseCam project and represents a logical continuation of it.…”

Section: Logging a Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Remembering through lifelogging: A survey of human memory augmentation

Harvey

Langheinrich

Ward

2016

Pervasive and Mobile Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human memory is unquestionably a vital cognitive ability but one that can often be unreliable. External memory aids such as diaries, photos, alarms and calendars are often employed to assist in remembering important events in our past and future. The recent trend for lifelogging, continuously documenting ones life through wearable sensors and cameras, presents a clear opportunity to augment human memory beyond simple reminders and actually improve its capacity to remember. This article surveys work from the fields of computer science and psychology to understand the potential for such augmentation, the technologies necessary for realising this opportunity and to investigate what the possible benefits and ethical pitfalls of using such technology might be.

show abstract

Section: Logging a Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Remembering through lifelogging: A survey of human memory augmentation

Harvey

Langheinrich

Ward

2016

Pervasive and Mobile Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hoyle et al [10] evaluate dedicated lifelogging devices, such as the Narrative Clip 6 , the Autographer 7 , and data glasses with lifelogging functionality with regard to application scenarios, usage and sharing of the collected data as well as privacy perception. Benefits, risks, as well as legal aspects of lifelogging are discussed by Wolf et al [30].…”

Section: Social Implications Of Video Recordingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Don't look at me that way!

Koelle

Kranz

Möller³

2015

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Figure 1: We investigate how data glasses usage is perceived by device users as well as by their peers based on abstract, sketched scenarios. In particular, we investigate how knowledge about usage intentions -indicates as "thinking bubbles" affects social acceptance. For presentation, the sketched depictions are shown along with possible "real-world" equivalents. However, the actual study only made use of the abstractions, to prevent e.g. cultural bias. ABSTRACTData glasses do carry promising potential for hands-free interaction, but also raise various concerns amongst their potential users. In order to gain insights into the nature of those concerns, we investigate how potential usage scenarios are perceived by device users and their peers. We present results of a two-step approach: a focus group discussion with 7 participants, and a user study with 38 participants. In particular, we look into differences between the usage of data glasses and more established devices such as smart phones. We provide quantitative measures for scenario-related social acceptability and point out factors that can influence user attitudes. Based on our quantitative and qualitative results, we derive design implications that might support the development of head-worn devices and applications with an improved social acceptability.

show abstract

“…Potential harms Smart-glasses may become an extensions of human body and mind (Huang 2013) and enhance our interaction with the environment (Benessia and Pereira 2015) Make people feel uncomfortable (Wolf et al 2014) and result in "cyber sickness" (see text below) Alter (improve) health behavior (Doherty et May make people dependent (Bendel 2014) al. 2013).…”

Section: Potential Benefitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Potential exploitation and steering (Borean et al 2015), leak of sensitive information (Shen et al 2015) Compensate for impaired functions, such as landmark identification for persons with reduced visual ability (Ugulino and Fuks 2015) increasing their quality of life (He et al 2015) Breach Negative reactions (verbally or physical) by people in public spaces (Wolf et al 2014). Provide evidence and facilitate litigation (Bergman 2013) May reduce some cognitive capacities as they are "outsourced" to technology, e.g., navigation skills, or delegate crucial tasks to less skilled personnel.…”

Section: Potential Benefitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some manufacturers address these issues by adding a 'privacy indicator' light to their smart-glasses, like the latest M300 model from the company Vuzix. Negative reactions (even physical assault) towards people wearing smart-glasses in public places have been reported (Wolf et al 2014), and such reactions may depend on cultural context, place and time. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Smart-glasses can be used to monitor a person's level of attention (Lee and Balan 2014) and they are envisioned to provide unprecedented surveillance of everyday life (Steve Mann and Ferenbok 2013;Noble and Roberts 2016) on the one hand.…”

Section: Challenging Privacymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation