1984
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.109.6.812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Acclimation in Citrus Leaves. II. CO2 Assimilation and Light, Water, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

Abstract: Net CO2 assimilation (A) rates of ‘Duncan’ grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) and ‘Pineapple’ orange (C. sinensis L.) seedlings grown under 3 different photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD), were measured in an open gas exchange system under controlled environmental conditions. Apparent quantum yield (ø), mesophyll conductance to CO2 (Gm), leaf conductance to H2O vapor (G1), transpiration (E) and water use efficiency (WUE) also were examined. Leaves of both species grown under high PPFD (full sunlight) h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, VvmybA1 leaves acclimate through increased efficiency of transfer from Qa to Qb to achieve the same PItot as wild-type leaves. This suggests that these trees may perform better under high-irradiance and high-temperature conditions, conditions that typically reduce productivity as they require greater investment in photoprotective mechanisms [49,50]. Moreover, the efficiency/probability with which a PSII-trapped electron is transferred from QA to QB (as measured by ΨET20) was higher in VvmybA1 leaves, possibly compensating for the reduction in photon absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, VvmybA1 leaves acclimate through increased efficiency of transfer from Qa to Qb to achieve the same PItot as wild-type leaves. This suggests that these trees may perform better under high-irradiance and high-temperature conditions, conditions that typically reduce productivity as they require greater investment in photoprotective mechanisms [49,50]. Moreover, the efficiency/probability with which a PSII-trapped electron is transferred from QA to QB (as measured by ΨET20) was higher in VvmybA1 leaves, possibly compensating for the reduction in photon absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies described normal rates of photosynthesis (17) in leaves of declining trees with blight, but the leaf N content was elevated. Nitrogen content usually can be positively correlated to rates of net gas exchange (18), but in the case of blight, these leaves of higher N content have only normal photosynthesis, which may mean that these leaves are not producing at their potential. The lower N levels of trunk bark and wood of trees in Block 2 compared to Block 1 may have been due to the different rootstocks, since Zn levels have been shown to differ with rootstocks (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trunk bark (2) and wood (27) samples from opposite sides of the tree and leaf samples (10-leaf composite from southeast side) were collected during Summer 1983 and dried for elemental analysis. Trunk and leaf tissue samples were digested and N determined by Kjeldahl analysis (18). Similar samples were ashed at 550°C for 6 hr, dissolved in 25% aqueous HC1, and diluted to give 5% HC1 solutions of appropriate element concentrations for atomic absorption analysis for Zn, Mn, Cu, K, and Na (2,22,27).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gutierrez et al (11) have recently developed a vine growth model which was structured to allow for the effect of leaf age on photosynthesis. The observed changes in leaf N content throughout the growing season (33,37) and the effect of position within the canopy (light regime) on leaf photosynthetic capacity, N and protein content (16,22,31,32), suggest that N content would be a better indicator of a leafs photosynthetic potential than chronological age. Thus, the linear relationship between grapevine leaf net C 0 2 assimilation rate and leaf N content, both expressed on a dry weight basis (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%