2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.94.060501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-by-light scattering in the Lamb shift and the bound electron g factor

Abstract: We compute an O α 2 (Zα) 6 contribution to the hydrogen-atom Lamb shift arising from the light-by-light scattering. Analogous diagrams, with one atomic electric field insertion replaced by an external magnetic field, contribute to the gyromagnetic factor of the bound electron at O α 2 (Zα) 4 . We also calculate the contribution to the gyromagnetic factor from the muon magnetic loop.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerically, they are known for the Lamb shift [23,24], but for the g-factor only some classes of diagrams have been evaluated [25]. Analytical results are known for the full set of two-loop terms up to α π 2 α 4 Z [26,27] and for some vacuum-polarization diagrams [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerically, they are known for the Lamb shift [23,24], but for the g-factor only some classes of diagrams have been evaluated [25]. Analytical results are known for the full set of two-loop terms up to α π 2 α 4 Z [26,27] and for some vacuum-polarization diagrams [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We anticipate that this uncertainty can be also reached for the so far unknown two-loop LBL scattering terms with existing methods [67,68]. This will allow for the improvement of the muon mass, or a determination of the free muon magnetic anomaly by subtracting theoretical binding effects from the measured bound-muon g factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their calculation can be extended to the case of muons in a straightforward manner employing the methods of Ref. [67] or [68]. While the uncertainty due to these terms cannot be reliably given, in the table we estimate this uncertainty from the one-loop magnetic loop correction Δg ML as 10Δg ML In the calculation of the SE wave function correction [ Fig.…”
Section: Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results could be further improved by combining theoretical and experimental values for two different H-like ions (Sturm et al, 2014). This idea of combining precise g-factor measurements and QED calculations (Czarnecki and Szafron, 2016;Sturm et al, 2013a;Yerokhin and Harman, 2013), has recently yielded a 13-fold improvement on the electron mass determination (Köhler et al, 2015;Sturm et al, 2014;Zatorski et al, 2017).…”
Section: Microwave Studies Of the Bound-electron G Factormentioning
confidence: 99%