Lights and shadows over the Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape: ‘managing change’ in Ballarat and Cuenca through a radical approach focused on values and authenticity

Pérez, Julia Rey; Martínez, Plácido González

doi:10.1080/13527258.2017.1362572

Cited by 28 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…First of all, the section dedicated to the role of cultural heritage represents a snapshot of a heritage discourse that varies from democratization and emancipation to exclusion logics, marketization, and risks associated with lobbyismall parts of the wider challenge to integrate heritage management into planning policies and practices (Smith, 2006;Sykes & Ludwig, 2015;Rey Pérez & González Martínez, 2018). The HUL approach is positioned in this scenario as a way to preserve heritage and to manage historic cities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here, the concept of the immutable and unique value of a given heritage is transcended by the possibility of conceiving many overlapping and interconnected values that reflect different points of view (Sykes & Ludwig, 2015). This vision implies a proactive involvement of local stakeholders and citizens in planning the future development of their city and a wider access of stakeholders in heritage management (Rey Pérez & González Martínez, 2018). Thirdly, there is the possibility of incorporating new attributes for heritage evaluation in accordance with community and stakeholder perceptions (Van Oers & Pereira Roders, 2013).…”

Section: Landscape Approaches For Historic Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Taken as a complex whole, these topics highlight the close relationships between the current trends of urbanization, the challenge of cultural heritage conservation and reuse, and current urban planning strategies. On the one hand, the approach to heritage conservationgradually changing from mono-disciplinary to integratedincludes community engagement and the management of change at the city level (Ginzarly et al, 2019;Guzman et al, 2018;Rey Pérez & González Martínez, 2018). On the other hand, more and more political and urban agendas are focusing on cultural heritage as one of the pivotal core strategies for sustainable urban development (European Commision, 2014;Horizon 2020Expert Group on Cultural Heritage, 2015Potts, 2016;UNESCO, 2016a).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, more and more political and urban agendas are focusing on cultural heritage as one of the pivotal core strategies for sustainable urban development (European Commision, 2014;Horizon 2020Expert Group on Cultural Heritage, 2015Potts, 2016;UNESCO, 2016a). Specifically, in 2011, UNESCO adopted the Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape (HUL), conceived as a landscape approach to ensure the integration of cultural heritage policies and management concerns in the wider goals of sustainable urban development (Ginzarly et al, 2018;Rey Pérez & González Martínez, 2018). The HUL concept will be approached here in detail, taking into account the rich debate it has generated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Social Impact Evaluation in Culture-led Regeneration Processes: Reflections on the “Social Return On Investment” Perspective

Ragozino

2018

plaNext

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering that a relevant challenge for social enterprises is to assess their social impacts, this paper approaches this issue by investigating cases that exemplify engagement in cultureled regeneration processes. Assuming the paradigm of 'Complex Urban Landscape' (CUL) as a holistic approach focused on the role of relationships, and conceiving the social enterprise as a hybrid organisation potentially affecting the urban context, the author presents a reflection on one of the most-used and much-debated social impact evaluation methods, the Social Return On Investment (SROI). The research deals with three main challenges: the difficulties in integrating cultural heritage as commons within urban planning and practices; the potential role of social enterprises to transmit cultural value through experiences of culture-led regeneration processes; and the exigencies of planning and developing social impact evaluation capable of critically observing and narrating the theory of change proposed by social enterprises.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Landscape Approaches For Historic Areasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Social Impact Evaluation in Culture-led Regeneration Processes: Reflections on the “Social Return On Investment” Perspective

Ragozino

2018

plaNext

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is peculiar to note that the most important UNESCO documents—Vienna Memorandum (2005) and Recommendation on the HUL (2011)—mention authenticity of heritage only few times. Some researchers note that these documents purposely understate the importance of and the discussion about heritage authenticity (Rey-Pérez & González-Martínez, 2018). Meanwhile the authenticity remains at the centre of heritage debates (DeSilvey 2017; Fibiger, 2015; Labadi, 2010) and the approach towards authenticity actually determines the course of preservation actions (Rey-Pérez & González-Martínez, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Concept of Pervading Authenticity: Contribution to Historic Urban Landscape approach

Rudokas

Gražulevičiūtė–Vileniškė

2020

Journal of Heritage Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article focuses on the notion of Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) introduced by the UNESCO in 2005 and 2011 responding to the expanding understanding of cultural heritage and the urgent call to reconcile heritage preservation and contemporary urban developments and re-introduce heritage as a driver of urban and overall societies development. The analysis of the fundamental and recent literature on the theoretical grounding and the applications of HUL had revealed numerous benefits of this concept including the integration potential, acknowledgement of intangible dimensions of heritage and the values of contemporary architecture; however, several challenges and conflicts were identified as well: the challenge of the search of valuable historical patterns, the questions of what extent of change of historic environment is acceptable, and the underlying tension between the call to conserve the existing valuable historical fabric and the urge to employ heritage as the driver for high quality future development. The research suggests that the understanding of the notion of authenticity plays the fundamental role in the success of the HUL approach and, after reviewing the contemporary ideas on heritage authenticity, introduces permanent pervading authenticity, which would allow searching for valuable development patterns based on kairos time instead of chronos in the frame of the HUL concept.

show abstract

Sustainable Historic Urban Landscape: Valuation Tools

Rivera Dosman,

Vázquez,

Redaelli

et al. 2023

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lights and shadows over the Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape: ‘managing change’ in Ballarat and Cuenca through a radical approach focused on values and authenticity

Cited by 28 publications

References 23 publications

Social Impact Evaluation in Culture-led Regeneration Processes: Reflections on the “Social Return On Investment” Perspective

Social Impact Evaluation in Culture-led Regeneration Processes: Reflections on the “Social Return On Investment” Perspective

The Concept of Pervading Authenticity: Contribution to Historic Urban Landscape approach

Sustainable Historic Urban Landscape: Valuation Tools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About