2014
DOI: 10.1017/s1474748014000103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit Multiplicities for Principal Congruence Subgroups of And

Abstract: Abstract. We study the limiting behavior of the discrete spectra associated to the principal congruence subgroups of a reductive group over a number field. While this problem is well understood in the cocompact case (i.e., when the group is anisotropic modulo the center), we treat groups of unbounded rank. For the groups GL(n) and SL(n) we show that the suitably normalized spectra converge to the Plancherel measure (the limit multiplicity property). For general reductive groups we obtain a substantial reductio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Denote by z 1 , ..., z m ∈ C \ S 1 be the poles of A v (z). Then (z − z 1 ) · · · (z − z m )A v (z) is a polynomial of degree n with coefficients in End(H Kv πv ) and by [FLM15,Corollary 5.18] we get…”
Section: Logarithmic Derivatives Of Local Intertwining Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Denote by z 1 , ..., z m ∈ C \ S 1 be the poles of A v (z). Then (z − z 1 ) · · · (z − z m )A v (z) is a polynomial of degree n with coefficients in End(H Kv πv ) and by [FLM15,Corollary 5.18] we get…”
Section: Logarithmic Derivatives Of Local Intertwining Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For GL(n) the pertinent estimations exist for the logarithmic derivatives itself [MS04, Proposition 0.2]. In general, the key ingredient for the estimation of the integrals is a generalization of the classical Bernstein inequality due to Borwein and Erdelélyi [FLM15,Corollary 5.18]. The application of this result involves the estimation of the order at ∞ of matrix coefficients of local normalized intertwining operators R P ,P (π v , s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary difference is that we follow [Shi12] and [ST12] by fixing a discrete series representation at ∞ and examine the limit multiplicities only at finite places, whereas they look at limit multiplicities at infinite places. In [FLM14] they solved the Limit Multiplicity Problem for a large class of groups (specifically those satisfying properties (BD) and (TWN) as given in Section 5 of that paper. These groups include GL n and SL n ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent work, Abert, Bergeron, et al, Finis, Lapid, and Mueller, and Shin and Templier have solved the limit multiplicity problem for a large class of sequences of compact open subgroups in reductive groups G (see, for instance, [ABB+12], [FL15,FLM15], [Shi12,ST12]). In this paper, it is our goal to eliminate a pesky 'multiplicity' term from the statement of the Limit Multiplicity problem (at least for forms of GL n ) and to isolate representations of a given conductor, simply counting each with multiplicity 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%