Limitations of Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis in Mortality Prediction of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract

Abstract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of incorrect assessment of mortality risk factors in a group of patients affected by acute coronary syndrome, due to the lack of hazard proportionality in the Cox regression model. One hundred and fifty consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and no age limit were enrolled. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. The proportional hazard assumptions were verified using Schoenfeld residuals, χ2 test and rank correlation coefficient t between residuals and time. In the total group of 150 patients, 33 (22.0%) deaths from any cause were registered in the follow-up time period of 64 months. The non-survivors were significantly older and had increased prevalence of diabetes and erythrocyturia, longer history of coronary artery disease, higher concentrations of serum creatinine, cystatin C, uric acid, glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), homocysteine and B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and lower concentrations of serum sodium. No significant differences in echocardiography parameters were observed between groups. The following factors were risk of death factors and fulfilled the proportional hazard assumption in the univariable model: smoking, occurrence of diabetes and anaemia, duration of coronary artery disease, and abnormal serum concentrations of uric acid, sodium, homocysteine, cystatin C and NT-proBNP, while in the multivariable model, the risk of death factors were: smoking and elevated concentrations of homocysteine and NT-proBNP. The study has demonstrated that violation of the proportional hazard assumption in the Cox regression model may lead to creating a false model that does not include only time-independent predictive factors.

Differential gene expression analysis pipelines and bioinformatic tools for the identification of specific biomarkers: A review

“…The primary presumption of the traditional Cox hazard analysis is the proportionality of the risk [170] . Erroneous conclusions can be drawn by treating variables that become more pronounced as hazard factors during follow-up or even disappear altogether over time as their association with the hazard or risk under study diminishes or becomes negligible over time [171] . Thus, Cox analysis can be used to identify risk factors and biomarkers associated with a particular disease.…”

Follow-Up and Risk Assessment in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Using Artificial Neural Networks

“…The main disadvantage of univariate analysis is that it describes the survival with respect to the factor under investigation but necessarily ignores the impact of any others [30]. Nevertheless, it is likely that the assumptions required by the Cox model may not be satisfied because the model assumes that the underlying hazard rate is a function of independent variables, instead of the survival time [31].…”

Use of Ensemble Methods for Survival Prediction

“…If this assumption is violated, usage of CRM may not be valid. Unfortunately, this important assumption has been checked and properly reported in very few scientific publications [2]. An alternative to CRM is the parametric survival models that involve stronger assumptions than semi-parametric models.…”