2018
DOI: 10.1075/cal.22.08bor
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistics vs. language technology in constructicon building and use

Abstract: In this chapter, we describe the close interaction of linguists and language technologists in the Swedish constructicon project. This kind of collaboration is not so common today, because of the way that language technology has developed in recent decades, but in our case the collaboration has been very successful, and constituted a genuine instance of cross-fertilization, where an evolving language technology infrastructure and a computational lexical macroresource described in the chapter has formed an integ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study of a standard construction grammar in GF was carried out in Gruzitis et al (2015) and Borin, Dannélls, and Grūzītis (2018). It addressed the Swedish Constructicon (SweCcn) (Bäckström, Lyngfelt, and Sköldberg 2014), converting the semi-formal descriptions to GF grammar rules in a semi-automatic way.…”
Section: Construction Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of a standard construction grammar in GF was carried out in Gruzitis et al (2015) and Borin, Dannélls, and Grūzītis (2018). It addressed the Swedish Constructicon (SweCcn) (Bäckström, Lyngfelt, and Sköldberg 2014), converting the semi-formal descriptions to GF grammar rules in a semi-automatic way.…”
Section: Construction Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%