Linked color imaging improves visibility of reflux esophagitis

Abstract

Background With more prevalent gastroesophageal reflux disease comes increased cases of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Image-enhanced endoscopy using linked-color imaging (LCI) differentiates between mucosal colors. We compared LCI, white light imaging (WLI), and blue LASER imaging (BLI) in diagnosing reflux esophagitis (RE). Methods Consecutive RE patients (modified Los Angeles [LA] classification system) who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy using WLI, LCI, and BLI between April 2017 and March 2019 were selected retrospectively. Ten endoscopists compared WLI with LCI or BLI using 142 images from 142 patients. Visibility changes were scored by endoscopists as follows: 5, improved; 4, somewhat improved; 3, equivalent; 2, somewhat decreased; and 1, decreased. For total scores, 40 points was considered improved visibility, 21–39 points was comparable to white light, and < 20 points equaled decreased visibility. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient [ICC]) were also evaluated. Images showing color differences (ΔE*) and L* a* b* color values in RE and adjacent esophageal mucosae were assessed using CIELAB, a color space system. Results The mean age of patients was 67.1 years (range: 27–89; 63 males, 79 females). RE LA grades observed included 52 M, 52 A, 24 B, 11 C, and 3 D. Compared with WLI, all RE cases showed improved visibility: 28.2% (40/142), LA grade M: 19.2% (10/52), LA grade A: 34.6% (18/52), LA grade B: 37.5% (9/24), LA grade C: 27.3% (3/11), and LA grade D: 0% (0/3) in LCI, and for all RE cases: 0% in BLI. LCI was not associated with decreased visibility. The LCI inter-rater reliability was “moderate” for LA grade M and “substantial” for erosive RE. The LCI intra-rater reliability was “moderate–substantial” for trainees and experts. Color differences were WLI: 12.3, LCI: 22.7 in LA grade M; and WLI: 18.2, LCI: 31.9 in erosive RE (P < 0.001 for WLI vs. LCI). Conclusion LCI versus WLI and BLI led to improved visibility for RE after subjective and objective evaluations. Visibility and the ICC for minimal change esophagitis were lower than for erosive RE for LCI. With LCI, RE images contrasting better with the surrounding esophageal mucosa were more clearly viewed.

Predictive value of risk score using Kyoto classification of gastritis a few years prior to diagnosis of early gastric cancer

“…However, recently, the use of image‐enhanced endoscopes has improved diagnostic ability. Hence, it will be necessary to prospectively evaluate the effects of both classifications on gastric cancer diagnosis in the future 14 . Sugimoto et al .…”

The role of advanced endoscopy in the management of inflammatory digestive diseases (upper gastrointestinal tract)

“…The LCI inter-rater reliability was "moderate-substantial" for both trainees and experts for gradeM. 16 Another report indicated that detection rates for gradeM using WLI combined with LCI were higher than those using only WLI (48.9% vs. 33.0%, P < 0.001). 17 ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE I NOUE ET AL.…”

The role of endoscopy in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease

“…reported that LCI can improve the visibility of RE. 48 However, Lee et al. reported that inter‐observer agreements in diagnosing RE, including minimal changes in BLI and LCI, were not high.…”