2016
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipid changes during basal insulin peglispro, insulin glargine, or NPH treatment in six IMAGINE trials

Abstract: Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with hepato-preferential action resulting from reduced peripheral effects. This report provides an integrated summary of lipid changes at 26 weeks with BIL and comparator insulins (glargine, NPH) from phase III studies in type 1 diabetes (T1D), insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), patients with T2D on basal insulin only and patients with T2D on basal-bolus therapy. BIL treatment had little effect on HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients treated with glargine had no change in mean LFC, while patients treated with BIL had a mean increase in LFC [LSM difference at 52 weeks: 2.20% (1.26–3.13%); p < 0.001] (Additional file 1: Table S1) [8]. Positive correlations with changes in LFC were found for changes in medium HDL, large VLDL, and VLDL size, but only large VLDL in the glargine group correlated significantly (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Patients treated with glargine had no change in mean LFC, while patients treated with BIL had a mean increase in LFC [LSM difference at 52 weeks: 2.20% (1.26–3.13%); p < 0.001] (Additional file 1: Table S1) [8]. Positive correlations with changes in LFC were found for changes in medium HDL, large VLDL, and VLDL size, but only large VLDL in the glargine group correlated significantly (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean LFC did not change in the glargine group, but increased from baseline in the BIL group [LSM difference at 52 weeks: 5.27% (3.43–7.11%); p < 0.001] (Additional file 1: Table S1) [8]. Some correlations were found for changes in lipoprotein parameters with changes in LFC in patients taking BIL (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations