2023
DOI: 10.1007/s41542-022-00141-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live-streaming Activity and Relaxation Breaks: a (Home-)Office-Compatible Approach to Promote Break Recovery, Mood, and Attention?

Abstract: The aim of this study is to investigate whether short, live-streaming activity and relaxation lunch breaks have positive associations with office workers’ mood (calmness, valence, and energetic arousal), back pain, and attention after break and whether these associations are mediated by better break recovery. Additionally, we considered the two respite interventions as resources possibly buffering the effects of elevated situational job demands. Ten-minute break exercises were conducted during lunch breaks via… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the ACT (Eysenck et al, 2007) and former studies that used the SART in recovery research (Pasanen et al, 2018;Riedl et al, 2023), calmness was significantly associated with a reduced number of commission errors in the SART, which indicates enhanced cognitive inhibition. Sliwinski et al (2006) noted that stress effects do not become evident in simple tasks, such as the PVT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with the ACT (Eysenck et al, 2007) and former studies that used the SART in recovery research (Pasanen et al, 2018;Riedl et al, 2023), calmness was significantly associated with a reduced number of commission errors in the SART, which indicates enhanced cognitive inhibition. Sliwinski et al (2006) noted that stress effects do not become evident in simple tasks, such as the PVT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For further analyses, the shortest measurement duration that provided at least a fair reliability of change for errors ( R c > 0.40) and at least a moderate reliability of change for reaction time ( R c > 0.60) was selected for each test ( Shrout, 1998 ). Based on the literature ( Schmidt-Atzert et al, 2004 ) and in line with prior studies (e.g., T. Chung et al, 2020 ; Daniëls et al, 2020 ; Grant et al, 2017 ; Riedl et al, 2023 ), we focused on the most prominent outcomes for each test. For the DSST, we focused on the number of errors indicating response accuracy, and response efficiency was defined as the number of correct trials achieved within a pure reaction time of 1 second.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation