2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging via Mean Shape Fitting with Fully Convolutional Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results for segmentation of liver and spleen in the reference MRI experiment were slightly lower than results reported by other research groups (e.g. [6,16,17]). While this may also be caused by the small data set, it indicates room for improvement regarding our architecture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our results for segmentation of liver and spleen in the reference MRI experiment were slightly lower than results reported by other research groups (e.g. [6,16,17]). While this may also be caused by the small data set, it indicates room for improvement regarding our architecture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…To this end, we investigated an approach to segment three organs (liver, spleen and spine) directly in PET images utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These organs have been chosen because liver and spleen, on the one hand, have been segmented successfully in MR and CT images [6,16,17]. The spine, on the other hand, is a rather complex organ composed of many small vertebrae, making it a more challenging task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many current state-of-the-art deep learning segmentation algorithms use encoder-decoder network architectures, and many practical improvements in segmentation performance can be realized through innovations in pre-processing [ 51 ], data augmentation and loss functions [ 29 ]. Previous liver segmentation studies have used the U-net architecture [ 19 , 29 , 32 , 36 , 37 , 39 ] or its variants [ 34 , 38 ]. The method of Bousabarah et al [ 19 ] trained on 121 triphasic MR scans and tested on a set of 26 patients yielded a mean DSC of 0.91 (±0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of Bousabarah et al [ 19 ] trained on 121 triphasic MR scans and tested on a set of 26 patients yielded a mean DSC of 0.91 (±0.01). The proposed fully convolutional neural network of Zeng et al [ 34 ] used T2-weighted MR images and showed a DSC (mean±SD) of 0.952±0.01 on 51 validation patients. Wang et al’s 2D U-net CNN for liver segmentation yielded a mean DSC of 0.95±0.03 with their method trained using 330 MRI and CT scans and tested on 100 T1-weighted MR images [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic segmentation of medical images is regularly performed using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), such as the U-Net [15]. One alternative segmentation method uses a combination of CNNs and spatial transformers to learn the spatial warping required to transform a set of prior shapes into the desired class labels [10,18,17,8,19]. Such methods have outperformed conventional encoder-decoder and state-of-the-art architectures, however, they have no topological guarantees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%