2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Stiffness Measured with Two-dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography Is Predictive of Liver-related Events in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Due to Hepatis B Viral Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TE was recommended as a first-line examination for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (31). Previous studies found that 2D SWE had comparable diagnostic accuracy to TE (8,11,12). Moreover, it is inappropriate for hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis to perform TE because of ascites and liver atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TE was recommended as a first-line examination for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (31). Previous studies found that 2D SWE had comparable diagnostic accuracy to TE (8,11,12). Moreover, it is inappropriate for hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis to perform TE because of ascites and liver atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, when measuring 2D SWE values, we can simultaneously measure PVv and monitor ascites and liver tumors. Wu et al (12) demonstrated that 2D SWE could predict liverrelated events in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. Jin et al (10) found that 2D SWE improved the predictive performance of MELD in ACLF patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, the post-treatment LSM of 2D-SWE, but not the pre-treatment level or dynamic changes in LSM, appeared to be a superior predictor of LRE in our study. In patients without decompensated cirrhosis, the baseline levels of 2D-SWE or quick liver stiffness response seemed to be useful markers for predicting LREs or remission of disease (8,18). This may be because pre-treatment 2D-SWE simply reflects the baseline status, whereas the post-treatment LSM level may represent the combination of baseline and the treatment response, and the treatment response has been reported to have high heterogeneity (23,24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis covering 13 studies and 1,143 patients demonstrated that 2D-SWE has a better performance for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) increasing by 0.003-0.034 when diagnosing cirrhosis (P=0.022) (7). However, in a recent report of a 4-year follow-up with rare liver-related events (LREs) (6.7%), baseline LSM of 2D-SWE showed an AUC similar to that of transient elastography (AUC, 0.86 vs. 0.88, P=0.71) for the prediction of liver-related outcomes in patients with CHB, which may ignore the value of dynamic changes of 2D-SWE (8). Therefore, it would be necessary to explore the predictive value of baseline and dynamic changes in 2D-SWE in hepatic complications for those with decompensated cirrhosis receiving antiviral therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%