2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icde.2007.367885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load Distribution Fairness in P2P Data Management Systems

Abstract: the "poor metrics", the "offline metrics", and the "localoptima" problems. We address the issue of measuring storage, or queryIn the related literature one can find plenty of metrics load distribution fairness in peer-to-peer data for load balancing purposes. However, these metrics are management systems. Existing metrics may look only used to evaluate specific load balancing algorithms, promising from the point of view of specific peers, while and they convey poor information regarding the actual in reality b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus further instrumented FreePastry to report on the aforesaid metrics; namely node insertion hits and node query hits. In order to visualize the impact of the different approaches on load distribution, we employed the Gini Coefficient [Damgaard and Weiner 2000], as advocated in Pitoura and Triantafillou [2007]. In brief, Pitoura and Triantafillou [2007] compare the appropriateness and performance of nine of the most well-known distribution fairness metrics (including the standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, coefficient of variation, 2:34 • N. Ntarmos et al maximum-to-minimum load ratio, fairness index, Lorenz curves, and the Gini Coefficient) for P2P applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus further instrumented FreePastry to report on the aforesaid metrics; namely node insertion hits and node query hits. In order to visualize the impact of the different approaches on load distribution, we employed the Gini Coefficient [Damgaard and Weiner 2000], as advocated in Pitoura and Triantafillou [2007]. In brief, Pitoura and Triantafillou [2007] compare the appropriateness and performance of nine of the most well-known distribution fairness metrics (including the standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, coefficient of variation, 2:34 • N. Ntarmos et al maximum-to-minimum load ratio, fairness index, Lorenz curves, and the Gini Coefficient) for P2P applications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lorenz curves and the Gini coefficient have been recently proposed as an appropriate metric to describe load imbalances in p2p systems [37]. Lorenz curves are functions of the cumulative percentage of ordered items mapped onto the corresponding cumulative percentage of their size.…”
Section: Load Balancing During Event and Subscription Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, load balancing [27,36] is an important problem in P2P networks. Dynamical data items and skewed user query patterns in P2P systems may cause some of the peers to become bottlenecks, thereby resulting in severe load imbalance and consequently increasing user response time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%