Local Economic Development in an Age of Devolution: The Question of Rural Localities*

Abstract

There is limited recent research on the strategies that rural local governments are employing in the face of changing intergovernmental relationships, especially in relation to local economic development. This paper draws on data from a survey of local governments in the Ohio River Valley Region that includes a mix of localities on the urban‐rural continuum, to empirically address three issues. First, we examined the extent to which county governments have undertaken local economic development initiatives as well as other, extra‐economic activities designed to improve community well‐being. Second, we assessed the extent to which rural county governments vary from urban counties in their activities and available resources. Finally, we employed logistic regression models of factors associated with use of development strategies to determine the relationship between rurality and local development policy activities. The results show that rural counties are less likely than urban counties to undertake various economic development activities, with observed urban‐rural differences largely attributable to county socioeconomic disadvantages, such as poverty and education.

Poverty and Local Governments: Economic Development and Community Service Provision in an Era of Decentralization

“…As discussed earlier, surveys have limitations, among them the types of variables that can be collected. We focus on the scope of policy‐related activities undertaken following other researchers (Dewees, Lobao, and Swanson 2003; Jenkins, Leicht, and Wendt 2006; Reese and Rosenfeld 2002; Wolman 1996).…”

Civic government or market-based governance? The limits of privatization for rural local governments

“…Donahue (1997) argues these trends have promoted destructive inter-governmental competition. We see emerging a world of successful entrepreneurial city regions (Jessop 1997), while rural areas are increasingly left behind (Dewees et al 2003;Warner 2006). The emergence of an uneven landscape of citizenship rights due to differences in quality and access to services across localities has led to questions about the limits of market approaches to government.…”

Entrepreneurship policy and economic growth: Solution or delusion? Evidence from a state initiative

“…Nonetheless, very few studies at the county level are available in the literature (Betz et al 2012;Dewees et al 2003;Lobao and Kraybill 2005).…”