2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp02333k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local energy decomposition analysis and molecular properties of encapsulated methane in fullerene (CH4@C60)

Abstract: Methane has been successfully encapsulated within cages of C60 fullerene, and it is an appropriate model system to study confinement effects. Its chemistry and physics is also relevant for theoretical...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(160 reference statements)
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction energy values for He@C 60 , Ne@C 60 , Ar@C 60 and Kr@C 60 obtained using the DLPNO‐CCSD(T)/def2‐TZVP methodology were found to be −1.4, −3.1 and −12.2, and −13.6 kcal/mol, respectively. Interestingly, our interaction energies for He@C 60 and Ne@C 60 are in good agreement with the ones reported by Hesselmann and Korona [59] using the DFT‐SAPT method, while the interaction energies for Ar@C 60 and Kr@C 60 are in excellent agreement with the ones reported by Jaworski and Hedin (DLPNO‐CCSD(T)) [45] . The difference between the two sets of results (ours and Jaworski et al.)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The interaction energy values for He@C 60 , Ne@C 60 , Ar@C 60 and Kr@C 60 obtained using the DLPNO‐CCSD(T)/def2‐TZVP methodology were found to be −1.4, −3.1 and −12.2, and −13.6 kcal/mol, respectively. Interestingly, our interaction energies for He@C 60 and Ne@C 60 are in good agreement with the ones reported by Hesselmann and Korona [59] using the DFT‐SAPT method, while the interaction energies for Ar@C 60 and Kr@C 60 are in excellent agreement with the ones reported by Jaworski and Hedin (DLPNO‐CCSD(T)) [45] . The difference between the two sets of results (ours and Jaworski et al.)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The difference between the two sets of results (ours and Jaworski et al.) presumably arises from the fact that Jaworski and Hedin [45] carried out PBE ‘‘revPBE’’ exchange‐correlation calculations in conjunction with an atom‐pairwise dispersion correction (D4) for geometry optimization, while we have used the DFT(MN15)/cc‐pVTZ method. Also, different basis sets were used in single‐point energy calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[90][91][92][93] Quantitative insights into challenging noncovalent interactions in endohedral fullerene complexes have for example been achieved with the DLPNO-CCSD(T) scheme in recent years. 94 A complementary formulation for high-spin open-shell systems has also been developed. 95,96 Moreover, within the DLPNO-CCSD scheme the use of L-equations for unrelaxed coupled cluster density provides spin densities and first-order properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%