2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Low Shear Stress and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, our CE wall variable was a surrogate for endothelial dysfunction, albeit a biologically plausible one, as previously outlined. This is also supported by recent reports in coronary artery segments that showed CFD-derived low WSS was independently associated with epicardial and microvascular endothelial dysfunction after acetylcholine infusion [44].…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, our CE wall variable was a surrogate for endothelial dysfunction, albeit a biologically plausible one, as previously outlined. This is also supported by recent reports in coronary artery segments that showed CFD-derived low WSS was independently associated with epicardial and microvascular endothelial dysfunction after acetylcholine infusion [44].…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…19 Coronary artery diameter was measured at baseline and with acetylcholine infusion by an independent investigator blinded to Doppler velocity data using a previously described computer-based image analysis system. 20,21 CBF was then calculated as = (average peak velocity) (coronary artery diameter/2) 2 . 16 Coronary vascular resistance was calculated as mean arterial pressure divided by CBF.…”
Section: Coronary Microvascular Function Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Endothelium-dependent CMD was defined as an increase in CBF ≤ 0% in response to acetylcholine. 21 Impaired endotheliumindependent microvascular function was defined as CFR ≤ 2. 5.…”
Section: Coronary Microvascular Function Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, with a growing trend, prediabetes affects .38% of people in the adult population, and it is associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes (3). Although some prospective studies have shown that prediabetes is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (4,5), other studies have not found a similar association (6)(7)(8). However, several previous metaanalyses have led to conflicting conclusions (3,9,10), due to differences in end point assessments and study inclusion criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%