1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00917-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: High Incidence in Young Patients and Association with Poor Survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
131
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
11
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…14 -16 Tumor specimens from young patients have been reported to have poor biologic features that lead to a less favorable prognosis. 3,17 Our results, however, are limited by self-reports and by missing more aggressive biologic features such as HER-2/neu. Reports concerning age and prognosis have shown that high tumor grade represents a discriminatory prognostic factor between younger and older premenopausal patients with operable breast carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…14 -16 Tumor specimens from young patients have been reported to have poor biologic features that lead to a less favorable prognosis. 3,17 Our results, however, are limited by self-reports and by missing more aggressive biologic features such as HER-2/neu. Reports concerning age and prognosis have shown that high tumor grade represents a discriminatory prognostic factor between younger and older premenopausal patients with operable breast carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There are two main factors which need to be considered in order to weigh up this trade-off: the risk of local relapse (LR) and the risk of radiation-related heart disease (RRHD). The risk of LR is increased by factors such as young age [16][17][18][19], high tumour grade [19], the presence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) [17] and negative ER status [20], and particular caution should be used when compromising target tissue coverage in these groups of patients. To help with this problem, nomograms have been developed to assess the risk of ipsilateral breast recurrence, such as that from the EORTC 22881-10882 boost versus no boost trial [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no other oncogenic markers as predictors of locoregional recurrence have been identified previously. At present, the common risk factors for local control after breastconserving treatment are: patient age, margin status, and the presence of an extensive intraductal component (De la Rochefordiere et al, 1993;Elkhuizen et al, 1998;Voogd et al, 1999Voogd et al, , 2001). The addition of new predictive markers for locoregional recurrence may help in guiding the optimal type of local therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%