2019
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1451-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized Right Subclavian Artery Dissection Detected by Accident on an Ultrasound Examination: A Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: Right subclavian artery dissection was detected in a 78-year-old female victim of the Kumamoto earthquake during a carotid artery ultrasound examination. She was subsequently taken to hospital and diagnosed with localized subclavian artery dissection (LSAD) by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. There have been no previous reports of LSAD detected at a medical checkup. LSAD may progress and become severe, even in asymptomatic patients or patients with mild symptoms, and careful long-term follow-up is theref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The back pain that was described in our case was most likely due to esophageal irritation secondary to NG tube mal-positioning. In the peer-reviewed literature, there has been one other reported case of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic idiopathic SAD as in our patient [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The back pain that was described in our case was most likely due to esophageal irritation secondary to NG tube mal-positioning. In the peer-reviewed literature, there has been one other reported case of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic idiopathic SAD as in our patient [ 1 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…SAD without a known cause is quite rare and not well understood [ 1 ]. Although spontaneous or minimally traumatic cases have been documented; most cases are secondary to trauma, connective tissue disease, arterial catheterization or aortic arch anomalies [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations