2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locking plate fixation versus antegrade intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extra-articular distal femoral fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria 3,17–75 (Table I). The included articles were from 37 different journals, had 58 different first authors, and were published between 1990 and 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria 3,17–75 (Table I). The included articles were from 37 different journals, had 58 different first authors, and were published between 1990 and 2022.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All but one of these studies [ 19 ] includes functional scores, ranging from assessment of range of motion, to the KOOS [ 22 ] or Lysholm Score [ 23 ]. The functional scores between the two techniques have been largely equivocal, with only two studies [ 24 ] [ 18 ] concluding that function in the IMN group was statically significantly superior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Functional score–Sanders criteria) Meneghini [ 19 ] 2014 91 6–176 Locking plate v retrograde IMN The rate of non-unions in the IM nail group was 9% compared to 19% non-union/delayed unions in the LP group No functional score Park [ 20 ] 2016 41 24–66 Locking plate v retrograde IMN IMN group had a higher rate of malunion, no statistical difference between the clinical outcomes of both groups Gill [ 17 ] 2017 42 3–16 Locking plate v retrograde IMN IMN produced greater operative time and blood loss. The functional and union time between the two groups was not statistically significant different Ocalan [ 24 ] 2019 97 41–130 Locking plate v antegrade IMN Antegrade IMN achieved significantly better functional outcomes and less non-unions. (Functional score –lysholm) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The option of internal fixation was based on factors such as fractures' state, comorbidity, and skin condition. Theoretically, a locking plate has a potential advantage in osteoporotic bone, provides sufficient strength to resist pullout, and this fixation allows screws to improve the stability of construction and facilitate bridging fixation, helping to maintain the reduced calcaneus morphology (29,30). In particular, the locking plate is fit for Sanders type II and III fractures (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%