1980
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-060309-1.50013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logico-Structural Approach to Computer-Assisted Drug Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-quantitative SAR (Structure-Activity Relationships) models developed in the 1970s by Hiller, 37,38 Golender and Rosenblit, 39,40 Piruzyan, Avidon et al, 41 Cramer, 42 Brugger, Stuper and Jurs, 43,44 and Hodes et al 45 were inspired by the, at that time, popular artificial intelligence, expert systems, machine learning and pattern recognition paradigms. In those approaches, chemical structures were described by means of indicators of the presence of structural fragments interpreted as topological (or 2D) pharmacophores (biophores, toxophores, etc.)…”
Section: Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The non-quantitative SAR (Structure-Activity Relationships) models developed in the 1970s by Hiller, 37,38 Golender and Rosenblit, 39,40 Piruzyan, Avidon et al, 41 Cramer, 42 Brugger, Stuper and Jurs, 43,44 and Hodes et al 45 were inspired by the, at that time, popular artificial intelligence, expert systems, machine learning and pattern recognition paradigms. In those approaches, chemical structures were described by means of indicators of the presence of structural fragments interpreted as topological (or 2D) pharmacophores (biophores, toxophores, etc.)…”
Section: Historical Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCSs were first applied to SAR studies in the early 1980s by Rozenblit and Golender in the framework of their logical-combinatorial approach. 40,41,147 Since at that time computer power was limited, the authors suggested the use of reduced graphs (Section 1.3.5) built on pharmacophoric centers. The MCS fragments were subsequently applied to perform a similarity search, 148 to cluster chemical databases 149,150 as well to assess biological activities of organic compounds.…”
Section: Maximum Common Substructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end a basic library of potentially active centers such as atoms or groups of atoms (functional groups) likely to be involved in drug-receptor interaction via van der Waals or other forces may be set up and used to create the concrete features for each particular problem via a set of rules (a language) in an open-ended way. Cases in point are the SSFN and the DCAM systems that are based on the predefined "descriptor centers" and distances between them (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Topological (Substructural) Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extended version of this procedure has successfully been applied to mutagenicity data by Tinker as a predictive test for hazard evaluation (43,44). Philosophically similar is the ORACLE procedure (22,24), which was developed for the purpose of guiding the screening of compounds in a battery of biological tests. The basis of ORACLE is a structure and pharmacological activity file including about 6000 compounds and 55 major types of pharmacological activities.…”
Section: Principles Of Topological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation