2023
DOI: 10.1155/2023/8934210
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Noncoding RNA SAMMSON Promotes Melanoma Progression by Inhibiting FOXA2 Expression

Abstract: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in melanoma initiation and development, serving as potential therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for melanoma. lncRNA survival-associated mitochondrial melanoma-specific oncogenic noncoding RNA (SAMMSON) is upregulated in many types of human cancers. However, the functions of SAMMSON in melanoma have not been fully elucidated. This study is aimed at investigating the expression and functions of SAMMSON in melanoma development. Bioinformatics analysis was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that SAMMSON expression is increased in tissue and cancerous cells of melanoma 9,10,15–17 . According to the literature, p32 expression is elevated in tumours.…”
Section: Sammson and Tumorigenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have shown that SAMMSON expression is increased in tissue and cancerous cells of melanoma 9,10,15–17 . According to the literature, p32 expression is elevated in tumours.…”
Section: Sammson and Tumorigenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded that SAMMSON, by modulating EZH2/H3K27me3 axis, regulates FOXA2 expression. Subsequently, FOXA2 impacts different aspects of phenotype malignancy in melanoma 17 . Malignant cancerous cells for providing metabolic demand are seriously dependent on protein synthesis.…”
Section: Sammson and Tumorigenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%