2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1354883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Financial Incentives and Investment in Daughters: Evidence from Conditional Cash Transfers in North India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many countries these trends are actively promoted by governments through laws, regulations, and policies that emphasize gender equality (Das Gupta et al 2004;Guilmoto 2012a). For example, several states in India have introduced financial incentives to discourage son preference among parents and encourage investment in daughters' education and health (Sinha and Yoong 2009).…”
Section: Factors That Reduce the Sex Ratio At Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many countries these trends are actively promoted by governments through laws, regulations, and policies that emphasize gender equality (Das Gupta et al 2004;Guilmoto 2012a). For example, several states in India have introduced financial incentives to discourage son preference among parents and encourage investment in daughters' education and health (Sinha and Yoong 2009).…”
Section: Factors That Reduce the Sex Ratio At Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 For descriptions of the media campaigns and regulations see Croll (2001), Das Naqvi (2006); for China's Care for Girls program see Li (2007); and for India's financial incentive program see «http: //wcdhry.gov.in/balika_samridhi_yojana. htm», and Sinha and Yoong (2009). 4 See endnote 2.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination rates for girl children did not improve following the initiation of the program, and as a result, the program had a negligible effect on improving child sex ratios. Sinha and Yoong (2009) identify more successes of the program, but they also find that these successes were limited. They use pooled birth-history data from the NFHS, but from all three rounds (with three rounds of data they can evaluate outcomes for girls in the short and medium term), and a difference-in-difference approach that exploits variation in the eligibility criteria.…”
Section: Conditional Cash Transfers (Ccts)mentioning
confidence: 96%