1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(98)00066-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Monoamine Depletion, Differential Recovery, and Subtle Behavioral Impairment Following Methamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
119
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
119
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previously published observations using the acute toxic dosing model (i.e., four injections of METH every 2 h; Daberkow et al, 2005;Eyerman and Yamamoto, 2005;Friedman et al, 1998;Ricaurte et al 1982;Straiko et al, 2007;Wallace et al, 2001), METH administration to rats not exposed to CUS did not produce depletions in 5-HT tissue content (Fig. 3B).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to previously published observations using the acute toxic dosing model (i.e., four injections of METH every 2 h; Daberkow et al, 2005;Eyerman and Yamamoto, 2005;Friedman et al, 1998;Ricaurte et al 1982;Straiko et al, 2007;Wallace et al, 2001), METH administration to rats not exposed to CUS did not produce depletions in 5-HT tissue content (Fig. 3B).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The neurotoxic effects are evidenced by long-term depletions in striatal dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) concentrations, and their uptake sites (Friedman et al, 1998;Ricaurte et al, 1982;Wagner et al, 1980), decreases in tryptophan and tyrosine hydroxylase activity (Bakhit et al, 1981), and cell loss (Deng et al, 2007;Sonsalla et al, 1996;Thiriet et al, 2005;Yu et al, 2004;Zhu et al, 2006). In addition to the hypotheses of oxidative stress and apoptosis as mechanisms of METH-induced neurotoxicity (for review, see Davidson et al, 2001;Kita et al, 2003;Quinton and Yamamoto, 2006), increases in the extracellular concentrations of glutamate (GLU) have been also suggested to play an important role (Abekawa et al, 1994;Nash and Yamamoto, 1992;Sonsalla et al, 1989;Stephans and Yamamoto, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sufficient doses, mAMPH causes long-term damage to DA terminals in the striatum and to forebrain 5-HT terminals, as evidence by long-term depletions in these two neurotransmitters, their synthetic enzymes, metabolites, and plasma membrane transporters (Koda and Gibb, 1973;Hotchkiss and Gibb, 1980;Schmidt et al, 1985;Wagner et al, 1979;Ricaurte et al, 1982;Axt and Molliver, 1991;Friedman et al, 1998;Chapman et al, 2001). The mAMPH-induced depletions of DA reverse with a very slow time course (Cass and Manning, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it might be suspected that rats exposed to doses of ( + )-methamphetamine that produce seizures and neurotoxicity would have nonspecific behavioral alterations, the contrary is more apparent. For example, novel object recognition is impaired in animals treated with ( + )-methamphetamine; however, novel place recognition and spatial learning and memory are intact (Belcher et al, 2005;Bisagno et al, 2002;Friedman et al, 1998;Schroder et al, 2003). It should be noted that Friedman et al (1998) showed that animals treated with ( + )-methamphetamine had a small deficit in latency to the platform in the MWM, but this was only apparent on one of the 5 days tested and no differences were noted in the probe phase.…”
Section: Effects Of 5-meo-diptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, novel object recognition is impaired in animals treated with ( + )-methamphetamine; however, novel place recognition and spatial learning and memory are intact (Belcher et al, 2005;Bisagno et al, 2002;Friedman et al, 1998;Schroder et al, 2003). It should be noted that Friedman et al (1998) showed that animals treated with ( + )-methamphetamine had a small deficit in latency to the platform in the MWM, but this was only apparent on one of the 5 days tested and no differences were noted in the probe phase. One residual effect that neurotoxic doses of ( + )-methamphetamine administration in adult animals Effects of 5-MEO-DIPT MT Williams et al does seem to produce reliably is a reduction in locomotor behavior, but this is likely the result of the reductions in dopamine produced by ( + )-methamphetamine (Wallace et al, 1999).…”
Section: Effects Of 5-meo-diptmentioning
confidence: 99%