2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term outcomes and predictive ability of non-invasive scoring systems in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
112
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different biomarkers proposed to be used for this purpose [2], in recent years, an increasing interest has been addressed regarding the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), which has been investigated mainly in adult NAFLD and other chronic liver diseases, such as viral hepatitis [14][15][16][17][18]. When compared with liver biopsy and other non-invasive methods, APRI appeared to be a promising biomarker for assessing liver fibrosis/steatosis, with the advantages of being at low cost and repeatable [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different biomarkers proposed to be used for this purpose [2], in recent years, an increasing interest has been addressed regarding the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), which has been investigated mainly in adult NAFLD and other chronic liver diseases, such as viral hepatitis [14][15][16][17][18]. When compared with liver biopsy and other non-invasive methods, APRI appeared to be a promising biomarker for assessing liver fibrosis/steatosis, with the advantages of being at low cost and repeatable [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who are already better established and have been externally validated are included in the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). However, only a few scores such as HEPAMET [ 41 ] have comparable accuracy to our score in predicting significant fibrosis (including also F2, beyond F3 and F4). Recently, a Latin American group validated all three scores (HEPAMET, FIB-4 and NFS) in a Latin America population, including Brazilians, also demonstrating good accuracy in terms of predicting significant fibrosis [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Larger, more diverse studies that include patients with different types of clinical liver diseases and a direct comparison to other non-invasive tests for cirrhosis required (3,11,(70)(71)(72)(73) In conclusion, this study establishes a clinical rationale for integrating direct analysis of IgG glycans for the active management of people with liver disease. The diagnostic performance of this method was dramatically greater than other non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis (Supplementary Table S8), such as FIB4, APRI and even tests that look at IgG glycans (11,16,74). One reason for this is the ability to not just look at total IgG but also the specific IgG sub-classes, which has not been performed before, as such studies were not technically feasible for large patient cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%