2016
DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2016.068
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term prescribing of new oral anticoagulants

Abstract: SUMMARYWarfarin and the new oral anticoagulants are licensed for non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism.The choice of anticoagulant depends on the characteristics of the patient and the medicine. Key considerations include patient adherence, kidney and liver function, and potential interactions with concomitant drugs. Dosing should accommodate these factors.Patients should be regularly monitored for bleeding, adherence to treatment, and changing comorbidities and concomitant drugs. Renal f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 Because AF is often poorly tolerated by heart failure patients in terms of symptom burden and risk of decompensation, one must consider rhythm control early in the treatment of a patient with signs of clinical heart failure and AF. 20,21 the above recommendations are applicable for patients with both AF and atrial flutter, and hold true irrespective of rate/rhythm control. Further, in the special case of 'valvular AF' (defined as the presence of a mechanical heart valve or moderateto-severe mitral stenosis), 12 warfarin therapy is the only effective recommended treatment option, and the newer OACs should not be used.…”
Section: Rate Versus Rhythm Controlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…11,12 Because AF is often poorly tolerated by heart failure patients in terms of symptom burden and risk of decompensation, one must consider rhythm control early in the treatment of a patient with signs of clinical heart failure and AF. 20,21 the above recommendations are applicable for patients with both AF and atrial flutter, and hold true irrespective of rate/rhythm control. Further, in the special case of 'valvular AF' (defined as the presence of a mechanical heart valve or moderateto-severe mitral stenosis), 12 warfarin therapy is the only effective recommended treatment option, and the newer OACs should not be used.…”
Section: Rate Versus Rhythm Controlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The choice of direct oral anticoagulant is individualised based on renal function, ability to adhere to the dosing schedule and the likely need for reversal of anticoagulation. 28 There are concerns that cryptogenic strokes may be due to undiagnosed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 29,30 creating the idea that anticoagulants may have a role even if the arrhythmia is not detected. 31,32 However, evidence to support this is lacking, and anticoagulants post stroke without evidence of atrial fibrillation are not recommended for secondary stroke prevention due to the increased risk of bleeding.…”
Section: Anticoagulants and Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of direct oral anticoagulant is individualised based on renal function, ability to adhere to the dosing schedule and the likely need for reversal of anticoagulation. 28 …”
Section: Anticoagulants and Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concurrent use of another anticoagulant or an antiplatelet agent would increase the risk of a bleed. The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), norepinephrine, or serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SNRI or SSRI) also increases bleeding risk [80]. Blood transfusion should be promptly started after intravenous fluids to correct the shock and establish hemodynamic stability.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%