Long‐term prognostic value of peak exercise echocardiogram in patients hospitalized with acute chest pain

Ortega, G; González, Juan Carlos; Espino, Alejandro Dionisio Sanchez; Martin, M; Garcia, Francisco Navarro; Lopez, F. Ruiz; Perales, F. Ramos; Gómez, José Luis Zamorano

doi:10.1111/echo.13530

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Currently, other groups also employed peak imaging on the treadmill. They have reported its use on different clinical scenarios such as chest pain units 26 and postmyocardial infarction 27 . In addition, it has been used in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to assess peak exercise gradients 28,29 …”

Section: Exercise Echocardiography Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography for ischemia detection

Peteiro

2022

J of Clinical Ultrasound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Of the stress echocardiographic methods, exercise should be the first choice for patients able to exercise, according to guidelines. Among ExE modalities, treadmill ExE with acquisition of images at peak exercise has several advantages, including high sensitivity and prognostic value. Overall, sensitivity of ExE is around 80%–85%, although figures for peak imaging on the treadmill are 85%–90%. Despite it, guidelines do not mention this method.

show abstract

Section: Exercise Echocardiography Modalitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography for ischemia detection

Peteiro

2022

J of Clinical Ultrasound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease

Beache

Mohammed

Koweek

et al. 2020

Journal of the American College of Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patients with acute nonspecific chest pain and low probability for coronary disease remain an important clinical management dilemma. We focus on evidence for imaging, in an integrated decision-making setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

show abstract

Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test—a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the major issues in management of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is classification of patients with atypical presentation who have low risk of having a coronary episode at presentation. There have been multiple studies on the stratification of high risk patients and medical management of such cases, however, there is a sub-class of patients who do not fit any category. In this paper, we have looked at the current literature on stratification of patients based on the study tools available and the risk of having a coronary episode during the following year. In our overview, we have found that the current methods in place namely, cardiac stress test and stress echocardiogram have a good prognostic factor in terms of mortality in the next one year and can safely stratify the patients at low risk when correlated with clinical presentation and laboratory studies. However, such data are limited for computerized tomography or magnetic resonant imaging and their application might be limited due to accessibility and cost of studies. Current guidelines for classification of high risk patient do an excellent job and we believe that proper application of stress tests together with other imaging modalities together with laboratory, clinical judgment, and proper use of medical management can help with safe discharge of patients from the emergency department (ED) and reduction of burden from healthcare.

show abstract

Long‐term prognostic value of peak exercise echocardiogram in patients hospitalized with acute chest pain

Cited by 3 publications

References 20 publications

Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography for ischemia detection

Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography for ischemia detection

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease

Incidence and predictors of acute coronary syndrome within a year following a negative stress test—a false sense of security: is routine screening any useful?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About