2018
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term Schneiderian membrane thickness changes following zygomatic implant placement: A retrospective radiographic analysis using cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: Chronic Schneiderian membrane thickening could result from zygomatic implant insertion. Intensive postoperative care and clinical and radiographic monitoring are recommended after zygomatic implant placement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor that resulted in a significant increase of infective complications was a thickness of the sinus mucosae greater than 3 mm (OR: 3.39, p = 0.019). The median thickness of the Schneiderian membrane reported in the literature is 1.03 mm and several authors have stated that the insertion of ZIs leads to an increase in the membrane thickness over time [ 33 ]. This phenomenon is explained by several reactive and inflammatory processes that occur after the implant placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor that resulted in a significant increase of infective complications was a thickness of the sinus mucosae greater than 3 mm (OR: 3.39, p = 0.019). The median thickness of the Schneiderian membrane reported in the literature is 1.03 mm and several authors have stated that the insertion of ZIs leads to an increase in the membrane thickness over time [ 33 ]. This phenomenon is explained by several reactive and inflammatory processes that occur after the implant placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Totally 23 patients (12 men and 11 women) with a mean age of 49.2 years (range 22‐75) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla with residual bone height <3 mm, good general condition and adherence to good oral hygiene 19 . Patients with maxillary defects or sufficient bone for implant placement other than zygomatic, acute sinus pathology, severe systemic disorders, contraindications for surgery, and history of oncological treatment for tumors of the head and neck were excluded 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al demostró que el grosor de la membrana de Schneider aumento de 1,03 a 1,33 mm, siendo esta diferencia estadísticamente significativa justificando los Complicaciones y satisfacción de pacientes rehabilitados con implantes cigomáticos extrasinusales en una clínica privada de Quito -Ecuador: un estudio retrospectivo 2020 -2021 Cedillo, M. / Sandoval, F. / Paz y Miño, E. 2021 cuidados clínicos y radiográficos postoperatorios. 2,6,21 Sin embargo, el incremento del grosor de la membrana por sí solo no es una indicación de patología sinusal severa. Las condiciones de salud sinusal recaen principalmente sobre la actividad fisiológica de la capa de epitelio pseudoestratificado ciliado dentro de la cavidad sinusal por lo que cualquier factor que comprometa la actividad mucociliar, el aclaramiento de la mucosa y el drenaje del seno maxilar a las fosas nasales puede incrementar el riesgo de sinusitis.…”
Section: Complicaciones De Implantes Cigomáticosunclassified
“…Las condiciones de salud sinusal recaen principalmente sobre la actividad fisiológica de la capa de epitelio pseudoestratificado ciliado dentro de la cavidad sinusal por lo que cualquier factor que comprometa la actividad mucociliar, el aclaramiento de la mucosa y el drenaje del seno maxilar a las fosas nasales puede incrementar el riesgo de sinusitis. 21 La tasa reportada de obstrucción del ostium luego de colocar implantes cigomáticos es similar a la de sinusitis y varia de 0 a 36,4 %. 21 Los tratamientos de sinusitis suelen requerir un manejo en conjunto con otorrinolaringología; inicialmente se debe abordar con la remoción de los depósitos en la superficie del implante, prescripción de clorhexidina al 0,12% por 15 días y terapia con antibióticos sistémicos más administración local de antibióticos y corticoesteroides.…”
Section: Complicaciones De Implantes Cigomáticosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation