2006
DOI: 10.1038/nature04787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long γ-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
915
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 790 publications
(974 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
50
915
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the collapsar progenitor in our binary model travels only 200 pc before it dies, compared to the 400...800 pc deduced by Hammer et al (2006), binary evolution resulting in higher runaway velocities are certainly possible (Petrovic et al 2005a). It remains to be analyzed whether the runaway scenario is compatible with the finding that long GRBs are more concentrated in the brightest regions of their host galaxies than core collapse supernovae (Fruchter et al 2006).…”
Section: Effects From Runaway Grbsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…While the collapsar progenitor in our binary model travels only 200 pc before it dies, compared to the 400...800 pc deduced by Hammer et al (2006), binary evolution resulting in higher runaway velocities are certainly possible (Petrovic et al 2005a). It remains to be analyzed whether the runaway scenario is compatible with the finding that long GRBs are more concentrated in the brightest regions of their host galaxies than core collapse supernovae (Fruchter et al 2006).…”
Section: Effects From Runaway Grbsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In particular, the host galaxies of GRBs have a distinct tendency to be subluminous [21] and metal-poor [23]. This has been demonstrated for GRB hosts both locally [24] and at cosmological distances [25], which suggests that low metallicity is a key ingredient in the production of a gamma-ray burst [24]. As we discuss in Section II, a rapidly rotating star, as required in the collapsar model [26], can retain much of its original mass and angular momentum if it is metal-poor [27].…”
Section: Fig 1 (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the few metallicities derived from the nebular line analysis point to sub-solar metallicities (Sollerman et al 2005). The GRB hosts also generally have sub-L * luminosities (Le Floc'h et al 2003;Fruchter et al 2006), consistent with low metallicities. Modjaz et al (2008) has, in addition, shown that GRBs occur in lower metallicity galaxies than the ones hosting a random sample of Type Ic SN.…”
Section: Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At low redshift, the association between the GRBs and massive star progenitors is well established by (i) Type Ic supernovae (SNe) identified at the positions of GRB events (Hjorth et al 2003;Mirabal et al 2006) and (ii) the location of GRBs in Wolf-Rayet galaxies (Hammer et al 2006). At high redshift, the connection between GRBs and star-forming regions is inferred by (i) GRBs found in blue galaxies with nebular lines indicative of on-going star formation (Le Floc'h et al 2003;Prochaska et al 2004) and (ii) GRBs observed within a few kpc from the weighted flux centroid of their host (Fruchter et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%