2022
DOI: 10.1177/10731911221128948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Across Ages 4 to 16 in the ALSPAC Sample

Abstract: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been widely used to study children’s psychosocial development longitudinally; however, such analyses assume longitudinal measurement invariance, that is, they presuppose that symptom manifestations are measured comparably across different ages. Violations of this assumption could bias longitudinal analyses and should therefore be empirically tested. This study tested longitudinal measurement invariance within a confirmatory factor analysis framework in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the RMSEA was < .06, the CFI was very close to the threshold and consistent with the recommendation to consider multiple fit indices (Kline, 2016), the fit at age 5 years was also considered adequate. These results were consistent with previous research using the present and other samples [27,32]. The five-factor structure did not fit well at ages 3 and 17 (CFIs < .90).…”
Section: Factor Structuresupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given that the RMSEA was < .06, the CFI was very close to the threshold and consistent with the recommendation to consider multiple fit indices (Kline, 2016), the fit at age 5 years was also considered adequate. These results were consistent with previous research using the present and other samples [27,32]. The five-factor structure did not fit well at ages 3 and 17 (CFIs < .90).…”
Section: Factor Structuresupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To address research question 2, measurement invariance was tested at ages demonstrating adequate model fit (i.e., ages 5, 7, 11, and 14 years). The aim of our analyses was not to test longitudinal measurement invariance; this has already been demonstrated in this sample [32] and others [27]. Instead, we were specifically concerned with between-group invariance at each of the time points separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal consistency was assessed using ordinal alpha coefficients (Gadermann, Guhn, & Zumbo, 2012 ) and was satisfactory at 12 (α = .79), 16 (α = .78) and 21 years old (α = .86). Both emotional symptoms and peer problems SDQ subscales show good convergent validity as well as measurement invariance over time (Goodman & Scott, 1999 ; Speyer, Auyeng, & Murray, 2022 ; Vugteveen, de Bildt, Theunissen, Reijneveld, & Timmerman, 2021 ). They both correlate with similar measures from other widely used scales, such as the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) and the Youth Self‐Report (YSR; Achenbach, 1991 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is designed to measure hyperactive and inattentive symptoms, ranges from 0 to 10, and has been validated against a DSM-5 diagnosis of ADHD in childhood and young adulthood . Previous studies indicate SDQ scores have configural, metric, scalar and residual invariance across ages 7 to 16 years (Speyer, Auyeung, & Murray, 2022), as well as internal consistency of SDQ subscales in adolescents/young adults in a clinical setting (Brann, Lethbridge, & Mildred, 2018). For reference, between ages 4 and 17 years, scores between 0 and 5 are classified as low, scores of 6-7 as slightly raised, or scores of 8-10 as high ADHD symptoms (Goodman, 1997).…”
Section: Measures and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%