2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-016-0369-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Look to the earth: the search for ritual in the context of mound construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, some archaeologists have begun to recognize that places have unique life histories that are significantly different than other places or objects (Boivin 2004; Walker 1995). Recent geoarchaeological and paleoethnobotanical work has contributed to the understanding of structured deposits and their formation processes (e.g., Goldstein and Hageman 2009; Kidder and Sherwood 2016; Morehart 2011; Roos and Wells 2017; Van Keuren and Roos 2013; Walker 2002). These works look at patterning in horizontal space and stratigraphic sequencing to reconstruct behavior.…”
Section: Structured Deposits and Ethnographic Analogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, some archaeologists have begun to recognize that places have unique life histories that are significantly different than other places or objects (Boivin 2004; Walker 1995). Recent geoarchaeological and paleoethnobotanical work has contributed to the understanding of structured deposits and their formation processes (e.g., Goldstein and Hageman 2009; Kidder and Sherwood 2016; Morehart 2011; Roos and Wells 2017; Van Keuren and Roos 2013; Walker 2002). These works look at patterning in horizontal space and stratigraphic sequencing to reconstruct behavior.…”
Section: Structured Deposits and Ethnographic Analogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His conclusions center on: (1) the function of mounds as places to safely house the vitality of communities in the face of an unstable, shifting world; and (2) the dynamic nature of their construction. Miller's work adds important ethnographic support to existing trends in archaeological research (e.g., seeing mounds as representative of active processes rather than static outcomes of past action [Pauketat 2007], understanding the importance of specific properties of raw materials and their arrangement [Kidder and Sherwood 2017], and viewing mounds as microcosms of Native worldviews [Knight 1989] or sociograms representing inherent dualities [Knight 1998]). His data likewise provide important new analogies from which to understand specific practices identified in the archaeological record (e.g., topsoil being removed before mound construction [p. 5], and practices surrounding standing posts on mound summits [p. 18]).…”
Section: University Of Pennsylvaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not straightforward, especially for those who work in more ephermal sites associated with hunter-gatherers. Closely linked to ideas of social memory and landscape is the concept of place-making (Basso 1996) and “persistent places,” locales that were used and occupied repeatedly over long periods of time (Kidder and Sherwood 2016; Schneider 2015; Thompson 2010; Thompson and Pluckhahn 2010).…”
Section: Mounds As Places Of Persistence and Social Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%