Looking Beyond Cash Transfers for Optimizing Poverty Reduction and Livelihood Sustainability in Rural Ghana: Comparative Analysis of Two Social Policy Interventions Against Poverty

Abstract

In this article, we argue that, if the poverty reduction inroads recorded from the declaration of the Millennium Development Goals could be optimized and sustained particularly in rural areas experiencing higher incidence of poverty and livelihood vulnerabilities, policymakers and development practitioners ought to look beyond cash transfer measures to embrace skills and technology transfer policies and programs. This approach has a greater tendency of creating appropriate context for the empowerment and enhancement of the production capacities of the poor in ways that guarantee their independence to engage in self‐help initiatives and resilient local livelihoods. This conclusion is drawn from comparative study outcomes of two Government of Ghana social policies for poverty reduction, namely—the Livelihood Empowerment against Poverty and the Rural Enterprise Program.

Picking the Right Arrow for the Target: Modelling the Economic Impact of Remittance on Agribusinesss Entreprenuership and Youth Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa

“…They posit that international remittance reduces sustainable economic growth (P. O. W. Adjei, J. O. Adjei, & Serbeh, 2020). These ambiguous findings do not derail the evidence of remittances on GDP growth and unemployment but clearly outline the multidimensionality of remittance.…”

Competitive clientelism, donors and the politics of social protection uptake in Ghana

“…Moreover, the value of the LEAP grant has remained persistently low (Abdulai et al, 2019), currently representing less than six days’ worth of food per month (Yablonski, 2017: 7). While studies have pointed to the programme’s positive impact on improving the living conditions of the extreme poor (Alatinga et al, 2020), there is also a fair degree of consensus that the limited value of the cash has meant that most beneficiaries have been unable to translate the grant into a requisite livelihood asset base (Adjei et al, 2020; Peprah et al, 2017). Moreover, after more than a decade of implementation, only a limited progress has been made in implementing the declared intention of linking beneficiaries to various complementary services (Roelen et al, 2017) and benefits to the urban poor remain particularly limited (Cuesta et al, 2020).…”

Poverty, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Africa

“…Reducing the poverty level in Africa has been one of the core objectives of most developmental policies of area governments. The 2030 Agenda of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) classifies poverty reduction (POV) as one of its main priorities which has remained challenging (Adjei et al, 2020). As demonstrated by Schumpeter (1934), entrepreneurial engagements may serve as a way out of poverty for individuals in developing countries due to its tendency to increase per-capita income and ability to improve welfare through job creation and human development (Nakamura, 2020).…”