2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1134-282x(01)77392-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Los Top 20 2000: objetivos, ventajas y limitaciones del método

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, statistical analysis has shown a good discrimination and calibration of the mortality predictive model used by IASIST. 20 Furthermore, several US studies demonstrate that these popular hospital profiling systems ( The Top 20, The Best Hospitals ), in spite of their limitations, produce results in accordance with more elaborate data sources used to assess health care performance in AMI. 30 Our small sample size (around 21% of public acute hospitals in Spain) and the non-random hospital selection further limit the scope for inferences and generalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, statistical analysis has shown a good discrimination and calibration of the mortality predictive model used by IASIST. 20 Furthermore, several US studies demonstrate that these popular hospital profiling systems ( The Top 20, The Best Hospitals ), in spite of their limitations, produce results in accordance with more elaborate data sources used to assess health care performance in AMI. 30 Our small sample size (around 21% of public acute hospitals in Spain) and the non-random hospital selection further limit the scope for inferences and generalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Health care quality data for cardiovascular conditions were provided by IASIST, a private company that has produced annual public reports since 2000 on the performance of voluntarily participating hospitals in Spain. 20 Benchmarks for cardiovascular conditions were released in 2003 and in 2006. 21,22 Confidential agreements preclude the identification of participating hospitals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included four hospital-level indicators which are calculated based on the ratio of the observed to expected number of cases, taking into consideration hospital-specific case mix and severity (Table 1 ). Details on the indicators have been published by IASIST [ 15 , 16 ] and statistics and calibrations are attached in Additional File 1 Annex 1. All IASIST indicators for this analysis are based on 2007 data to match the data on the quality improvement system that was gathered within the MARQuIS project in the same year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References to global quality development through performance evaluation of medical services are scarce, but comparisons of overall hospital quality performance exist in the US, the UK and Spain [44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%