Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports

Abstract

ObjectiveTo use the relation between cigarette consumption and cardiovascular disease to quantify the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke for light smoking (one to five cigarettes/day).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline 1946 to May 2015, with manual searches of references.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesProspective cohort studies with at least 50 events, reporting hazard ratios or relative risks (both hereafter referred to as relative risk) compared with never smokers or age specific incidence in relation to risk of coronary heart disease or stroke.Data extraction/synthesisMOOSE guidelines were followed. For each study, the relative risk was estimated for smoking one, five, or 20 cigarettes per day by using regression modelling between risk and cigarette consumption. Relative risks were adjusted for at least age and often additional confounders. The main measure was the excess relative risk for smoking one cigarette per day (RR1_per_day−1) expressed as a proportion of that for smoking 20 cigarettes per day (RR20_per_day−1), expected to be about 5% assuming a linear relation between risk and consumption (as seen with lung cancer). The relative risks for one, five, and 20 cigarettes per day were also pooled across all studies in a random effects meta-analysis. Separate analyses were done for each combination of sex and disorder.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 55 publications containing 141 cohort studies. Among men, the pooled relative risk for coronary heart disease was 1.48 for smoking one cigarette per day and 2.04 for 20 cigarettes per day, using all studies, but 1.74 and 2.27 among studies in which the relative risk had been adjusted for multiple confounders. Among women, the pooled relative risks were 1.57 and 2.84 for one and 20 cigarettes per day (or 2.19 and 3.95 using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors). Men who smoked one cigarette per day had 46% of the excess relative risk for smoking 20 cigarettes per day (53% using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors), and women had 31% of the excess risk (38% using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors). For stroke, the pooled relative risks for men were 1.25 and 1.64 for smoking one or 20 cigarettes per day (1.30 and 1.56 using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors). In women, the pooled relative risks were 1.31 and 2.16 for smoking one or 20 cigarettes per day (1.46 and 2.42 using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors). The excess risk for stroke associated with one cigarette per day (in relation to 20 cigarettes per day) was 41% for men and 34% for women (or 64% and 36% using relative risks adjusted for multiple factors). Relative risks were generally higher among women than men.ConclusionsSmoking only about one cigarette per day carries a risk of developing coronary heart disease and stroke much greater than expected: around half that for people who smoke 20 per day. No safe level of smoking exists for cardiovascular disease. Smokers should aim to quit instead of cutting...

Dual use of electronic cigarettes and tobacco in New Zealand from a nationally representative sample

“…While some dual users may have decreased the number of cigarettes they are smoking, these individuals are still exposing themselves to substantial risk. As noted above, a recent meta‐analysis found that even smoking one cigarette per day leads to 50% of the cardiovascular disease risk as smoking 20 cigarettes per day does 10 …”

“…For instance, even if e‐cigarettes result in some individuals cutting down the amount of combustible tobacco cigarettes they consume, this may not achieve significant health benefits. A recent meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies examining cardiovascular disease risk in light and moderate smokers found that smoking a single cigarette per day still carried half the risk of a cardiovascular event as smoking 20 cigarettes per day 10 . Clearly then, dual users are still exposing themselves to significant health risks.…”

“Heart disease never entered my head”: Women's understanding of coronary heart disease risk factors

“…Perhaps it is time for a wider discourse and greater emphasis on the risks and links between smoking and CHD as documented in Hackshaw et al. 's recent meta‐analysis Hackshaw, Morris, Boniface, Jin‐Ling, and Milenković (). Davidson et al.…”

Keeping smoking affordable in higher tax environments via smoking thinner roll-your-own cigarettes: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey 2006–15

“…This is problematic, as past research, while limited, suggests that RYO cigarettes do not have a significantly different level of risk to FM cigarettes, and that risk does not meaningfully change with the weight of tobacco per cigarette(Darrall and Figgins, 1998; Koszowski et al, 2014; Laugesen et al, 2009; Shahab et al, 2008; Shahab et al, 2009). Harm appears primarily to be determined by regularly smoking, and the number of years doing so, and to a much lesser extent, by the number of cigarettes smoked(Begh et al, 2015; Centers for Disease Control Prevention, 2010; Hackshaw et al, 2018). …”