2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07096-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-dose CT perfusion with combined use of CTP and CTP-derived coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp: validation with invasive fractional flow reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the optimal cutoff of MBF and the MBF of the remote myocardium reported by Bamberg et al ( 5 ), Greif et al ( 19 ), and Rossi et al ( 20 ) was significantly lower, which may be due to the fact that these studies included patients with MI and a history of revascularization. Studies excluding patients with a history of MI and a history of revascularization reported a cutoff value of MBF ranging from 89.5 to 106 ml/100 ml/min, and the MBF of the remote myocardium ranged between 116 ml/100 ml/min and 169 ml/100 ml/min ( 10 , 12 , 15 , 21 25 ), which are consistent with the present study. Obviously, the severity of myocardial ischemia in patients affects the optimal cutoff value of MBF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the optimal cutoff of MBF and the MBF of the remote myocardium reported by Bamberg et al ( 5 ), Greif et al ( 19 ), and Rossi et al ( 20 ) was significantly lower, which may be due to the fact that these studies included patients with MI and a history of revascularization. Studies excluding patients with a history of MI and a history of revascularization reported a cutoff value of MBF ranging from 89.5 to 106 ml/100 ml/min, and the MBF of the remote myocardium ranged between 116 ml/100 ml/min and 169 ml/100 ml/min ( 10 , 12 , 15 , 21 25 ), which are consistent with the present study. Obviously, the severity of myocardial ischemia in patients affects the optimal cutoff value of MBF.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous publications with positron emission computed tomography (PET) ( 7 , 8 ) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ( 9 ) have suggested absolute MBF values for normal participants and thresholds for discriminating ischemic myocardial disease. However, previous studies have shown that MBF values vary with different imaging modalities, and that CT underestimates the stress MBF of normal myocardia compared with PET ( 5 , 7 , 8 , 10 13 ). Therefore, it is necessary to establish the normal range of MBF through dynamic CT-MPI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To minimize the sedation effect, all swine were scanned randomly within 1 h of the sedation completion. Second, the dosage of ATP is based on clinical experience ( 7 , 15 ). For animals in a sedated state, the dosage of ATP used in the present study may not allow the animals to reach the maximum vasodilated state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Yi et al [14] conducted a study to investigate the diagnostic performance of 70-kVp stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion as a low-dose, one-stop cardiac CT examination in clinical application. Seventy-one consecutive symptomatic patients were prospectively recruited and scanned with stress dynamic myocardial CTP.…”
Section: Low Dose "One-stop" Ctpmentioning
confidence: 99%