2014 Joint Conference on Robotics: SBR-LARS Robotics Symposium and Robocontrol 2014
DOI: 10.1109/sbr.lars.robocontrol.2014.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Level Model Identification of a Quadrotor X3D-BL

Abstract: Resumo-This work aims at identifying the low level model of a miniature quadrotor, using a sensor of force and torque in the three axes of the Cartesian system. To do that, the first step is to obtain the low level model of the rotorcraft. Then we obtained the coefficient C f ,τ , which is a meaningful contribution of this work, since there are just a few works in the literature addressing such coefficient, necessary to convert the force and torque on the three axes in the individual strength of each propellan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested in [6], [23], [24], [42], [44], [45], [47], [52]- [56], in this work, the nominal parameters provided by the manufacturer and the new estimated parameters are assessed by comparing real-time experiments with simulations results, and by comparing the output prediction error of the regression model, which is also often called identifier error. Our results indicate that the new estimated parameters show more similarity to the experiments and lower output prediction error than the nominal parameter given by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested in [6], [23], [24], [42], [44], [45], [47], [52]- [56], in this work, the nominal parameters provided by the manufacturer and the new estimated parameters are assessed by comparing real-time experiments with simulations results, and by comparing the output prediction error of the regression model, which is also often called identifier error. Our results indicate that the new estimated parameters show more similarity to the experiments and lower output prediction error than the nominal parameter given by the manufacturer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%