1995
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.2.763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-threshold neuronal activity of spinal dorsal horn neurons increases during REM sleep in cats: comparison with effects of anesthesia

Abstract: 1. Cats were prepared for chronic recordings from the lumbar enlargement of the spinal dorsal horn. At the beginning of each recording session, a tungsten microelectrode was advanced through the dura in a physiologically intact, awake, drug-free animal, until amplitude discrimination provided a single neuron with a receptive field on the hindquarters. 2. Extracellular recordings of activity of each neuron were made during receptive field stimulation with tactile and thermal nonnoxious and noxious stimuli. 3. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that REM behaved independently from SWS suggests the presence of an independent sleep state with no analog under anesthesia. That the sleep state is different than the anesthetized state with regard to single neurons has been seen elsewhere (Torterolo et al, 2002; Cotillon-Williams et al, 2003; Kishikawa et al, 1995; see review by Hennevin et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The fact that REM behaved independently from SWS suggests the presence of an independent sleep state with no analog under anesthesia. That the sleep state is different than the anesthetized state with regard to single neurons has been seen elsewhere (Torterolo et al, 2002; Cotillon-Williams et al, 2003; Kishikawa et al, 1995; see review by Hennevin et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To date, REMS-related suppression of transmission has been reported for trigeminal sensory pathways and it was explained, at least in part, by a state-dependent primary afferent depolarization [118], [119]. In contrast, activity of dorsal spinocerebellar and spinoreticular tract neurons was reported to be suppressed, increased or unchanged [120], [121], [122], [123], [124], and the tactile receptive fields and tactile responsiveness of a majority of spinal dorsal horn neurons were increased during REMS [125]. The variability of these results may be caused by a convergence on these neurons of possibly opposite effects mediated by central REMS-related pathways and changes in peripheral inputs associated with the atonia of REMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because A5 neurons project to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, their silencing during REM sleep, along with the silencing of other noradrenergic neurons, may explain the increase in the size of the receptive field of dorsal horn neurons during this state (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%