2017
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s135145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low versus high radioiodine activity for ablation of the thyroid remnant after thyroidectomy in Han Chinese with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Abstract: AimThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of radioiodine (131I) therapy between two groups of patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) who received 30 mCi or 100 mCi radioiodine for ablation of the thyroid remnant after total thyroidectomy.MethodsThe study cohort was 173 patients, 85 of whom were given 30 mCi of radioiodine and the others were given 100 mCi of radioiodine. Follow-up involved neck ultrasonography, measurement of serum levels of thyroglobulin and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously it was considered that high-dose of Iodine-131 is appropriate for complete ablation of micro-metastasis and low-dose may not sufficiently serve the purpose however multiple research studies conducted in last 2 decades to assess the role of low-dose RAI in successful ablation have concluded that there was not much difference in successful ablation with low-dose in comparison to high-dose treatment, moreover low-dose was associated with low prevalence of adverse effects. 15 A clinical research study by Muzzaferi and Kloos in 2001 4 revealed that there was no difference in recurrence rates (4 and 6%, respectively at P = .1) between lowactivity (1037-1850 MBq) and high-activity (1887-7400 MBq) Iodine-131 remnant ablation group. Although low recurrence rate is reported with high RAI dose yet low-dose therapy is associated with additional benefits of short hospital-stay, less adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previously it was considered that high-dose of Iodine-131 is appropriate for complete ablation of micro-metastasis and low-dose may not sufficiently serve the purpose however multiple research studies conducted in last 2 decades to assess the role of low-dose RAI in successful ablation have concluded that there was not much difference in successful ablation with low-dose in comparison to high-dose treatment, moreover low-dose was associated with low prevalence of adverse effects. 15 A clinical research study by Muzzaferi and Kloos in 2001 4 revealed that there was no difference in recurrence rates (4 and 6%, respectively at P = .1) between lowactivity (1037-1850 MBq) and high-activity (1887-7400 MBq) Iodine-131 remnant ablation group. Although low recurrence rate is reported with high RAI dose yet low-dose therapy is associated with additional benefits of short hospital-stay, less adverse effects, and cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…8 Additionally, some authors have concluded that a low dose of radioiodine is as effective as a high dose of radioiodine for ablation of the thyroid remnant after total thyroidectomy for low-risk DTC. [33][34][35] Several factors are associated with unsuccessful RAI ablation, but in most studies, only lymph node recurrence was a significant factor. 36 In this research, in addition to lymph node recurrence, we found persistent positive Tg value and some false positive I-131 imaging, like thyroglossal duct cyst and thymoma uptaking I-131, all led to multiple RAI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Additionally, some authors have concluded that a low dose of radioiodine is as effective as a high dose of radioiodine for ablation of the thyroid remnant after total thyroidectomy for low-risk DTC. 33 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ablation success rates after the first dose were 78.2% in the low-dosage group and 73.3% in the high-dose group (P =0.36). Final success was 97.6% of those given the low dose and 98.9% of those given the high dose (P =0.54) (9) .…”
Section: 025mentioning
confidence: 95%