Lower urinary tract symptoms that predict microscopic pyuria

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesisUrinary dipsticks and culture analyses of a mid-stream urine specimen (MSU) at 105 cfu ml−1 of a known urinary pathogen are considered the gold standard investigations for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). However, the reliability of these tests has been much criticised and they may mislead. It is now widely accepted that pyuria (≥1 WBC μl−1) detected by microscopy of a fresh unspun, unstained specimen of urine is the best biological indicator of UTI available. We aimed to scrutinise the greater potential of symptoms analysis in detecting pyuria and UTI.MethodsLower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) descriptions were collected from patients with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms referred to a tertiary referral unit. The symptoms informed a 39-question inventory, grouped into storage, voiding, stress incontinence and pain symptoms. All questions sought a binary yes or no response. A bespoke software package was developed to collect the data. The study was powered to a sample of at least 1,990 patients, with sufficient power to analyse 39 symptoms in a linear model with an effect size of Cohen’s f2 = 0.02, type 1 error probability = 0.05; and power (1-β); 95% where β is the probability of type 2 error). The inventory was administered to 2,050 female patients between August 2004 and November 2011. The data were collated and the following properties assessed: internal consistency, test–retest reliability, inter-observer reliability, internal responsiveness, external responsiveness, construct validity analysis and a comparison with the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire for female lower urinary tract symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS). The dependent variable used as a surrogate marker of UTI was microscopic pyuria. An MSU sample was sent for routine culture.ResultsThe symptoms proved reliable predictors of microscopic pyuria. In particular, voiding symptoms correlated well with microscopic pyuria (χ2 = 88, df = 1, p < 0.001). The symptom inventory has significant psychometric characteristics as below: test–retest reliability: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.981; inter-observer reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.995, internal responsiveness F = 221, p < 0.001, external responsiveness F = 359, df = 5, p < 0.001. The correlation coefficients for the domains of the ICIQ-FLUTS were around R = 0.5, p < 0.001.ConclusionThis symptoms score performed well on the standard, psychometric validation. The score changed in response to treatment and in a direction appropriate to the changes in microscopic pyuria. It correlated with measures of quality of life. It would seem to make a good candidate for monitoring treatment progress in ordinary clinical practice.

Reassessment of Routine Midstream Culture in Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection

“…Symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), voiding dysfunction, pain, and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were recorded using a validated questionnaire with questions requiring a yes-or-no response ( 43 ). The context-related symptoms were summed within each of the four symptom groups.…”

Antibiotic resistance in urinary tract infections: A re-visit after five years and experience over two sites

“…10 Organisms grown are often similar to gut or vaginal bacteria. 11 However, this has been challenged as artificial and based on flawed research originally by Kass 12 and it is possible that the diagnosis of UTI needs to be re-examined.…”

Urothelial cells may indicate underlying bacteriuria in pregnancy at term: a comparative study

“…A lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS) profile was created using the “Artemis questionnaire”, a detailed 49 item questionnaire divided into four categories: stress incontinence symptoms, overactive bladder symptoms, voiding symptoms, and pain symptoms (Additional file 1 ). This questionnaire is used in clinical practice by a tertiary chronic LUTS clinic as a tool to identify urine infections and to assess treatment response in non-pregnant patients with chronic LUT symptoms [ 30 – 33 ]. In this study, the LUTS profile was used as an assessment of bladder distress.…”