2020
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s254972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Optimal Laparoscopic Management and Oncological Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Duodenum: Pancreaticoduodenectomy or Pancreas-Sparing Duodenectomy?</p>

Abstract: Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of the duodenum are rarely reported and optimal minimally invasive management has not been well proposed. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and different types of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy can be chosen; however, which to choose and its corresponding clinical outcomes and oncological concerns remain controversial. Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with GIST of duodenum underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (L-PD) or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (L-P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tomy is shown to be comparable safe and favorable short-term oncologic outcome comparing with laparoscopic PD in terms with less blood loss, much faster recovery time, and much less total cost [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…tomy is shown to be comparable safe and favorable short-term oncologic outcome comparing with laparoscopic PD in terms with less blood loss, much faster recovery time, and much less total cost [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In line with this concept, we previously reported the technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial sleeve duodenectomy for an infraampullary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum [ 3 ], and laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is shown to be comparable safe and favorable short-term oncologic outcome comparing with laparoscopic PD in terms with less blood loss, much faster recovery time, and much less total cost [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of 22 patients with D-GISTs located opposite the ampulla of Vater, both laparoscopic PD and laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy have been shown to confer comparable safety and oncological benefits[ 57 ]. It is important to take note that the laparoscopic pancreas-sparing duodenectomy group had shorter operative duration (364.2 ± 58.7 vs 230.0 ± 12.3 min, P < 0.001), less blood loss (176.9 ± 85.7 vs 61.1 ± 18.2 mL, P < 0.001) and much shorter recovery time (10.9 ± 3.8 vs 20.6 ± 11.1 d, P = 0.021), resulting in lower total cost (76972.4 ± 11614.8 yuan vs 125628.7 ± 46356.8 yuan, P = 0.006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in the LR group had fewer late complications than in the PD group and no postoperative newly developed diabetes mellitus. The MI-LR group had a shorter duration of surgery and a shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (28).…”
Section: Duodenummentioning
confidence: 91%