&lt;p&gt;Psychological Distress and Signs of Post-Traumatic Stress in Response to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in a Mexican Sample&lt;/p&gt;

González-Ramírez, Leivy Patricia; Arriaga, Reyna Jazmín Martínez; Hernández-González, Martha Alicia; Roca-Chiapas, José María De la

doi:10.2147/prbm.s259563

Cited by 71 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the current review, different types of risk factors have been identified which might be correlated with the psychological impacts of COVID-19 among health care workers have been identified which includes sociodemographic factors (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, occupation). 9 , 10 , 12 , 17 , 19 – 21 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 31 This is similar to the study of Germany, 3 Mexico, 38 the United Kingdom, 28 and a finding of China, 12 Luo et al 39 and different from the study of China. 27 …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

“…In the elderly populations, the magnitudes of anxiety, depression, and stress were found to be high as compared to younger ages, 10 , 17 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 31 which is consistent with the study of Asia and Europe 40 and inconsistent with the study of Mexico in which the psychological distress was prevalent in younger ages. 38 This might be due to the impact of the comorbidities, immune system capacity, and poor coping strategies elders experience with aging. Gender was another factor shown to have an association with common psychological conditions among HCW.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

Bekele

Hajure

2021

SAGE Open Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The mental health of the health care professionals is more likely to be affected by the coronavirus disease-19 compared to the general population. Accordingly, the current study aimed to summarize the magnitudes and determinants of the psychological impact of coronavirus among health care professionals. Methods: The studies from Medline via PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched from 5 September to 19 October 2020. The review was conducted as per PRISMA-2009 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Result: Initially, 6316 articles were searched from three databases (PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). Finally, 20 articles were filtered to be included in our review. Among different types of psychological impact, stress was reported that lies within the range from 5.2% to 100%, anxiety was reported from 11.1% to 100%, depression was from 10.6% to 58%, and insomnia was from 28.75% to 34%. Several factors were related to the negative psychological state of health care workers due to coronavirus disease-19 like educational level, occupation, gender, age, working environment, work experience, legal status, ethnicity, psychological comorbidity, social support, personal/family exposure, and feeling of health care providers. Conclusion: The most common psychological impacts among health care workers were anxiety and stress. Besides different sociodemographic factors that determine the psychological impacts, front-line health care workers and participants having psychological comorbidity have a high risk of negative psychological state impacts as compared to their counterparts. Therefore, special attention should tend to health care workers directly involved in the prevention and management of coronavirus disease-19 and having a different risk of mental health condition.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 67%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

Bekele

Hajure

2021

SAGE Open Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to the above, due to the fact that the sampling was non-probabilistic, there could be problems regarding the sample distribution, since, in the present study, most respondents were single women, from the center of the country, and with a high educational level. However, it suffices to review the sample distribution and characteristics of the participants in current research on to see that these data are consistent in various parts of the world, with women's responses ranging from 52% to 80% (Dai et al, 2020;González Ramírez et al, 2020;Muñiz & Corduneanu, 2020;Orellana & Orellana, 2020;Shacham et al, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 perception and preventive behaviors: A descriptive, comparative study by severity and perceived risk

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The prevention of COVID-19 infections involves the implementation of behaviors to reduce risk and protect health. However, engaging in these behaviors depends on the perception of the threat posed by the illness. Previous research shows the importance of illness perception in the case of communicable and non-communicable diseases, showing that they can change depending on the severity and risk attributed to them. Objective. Compare the illness perception and the practice of preventive and exposure behavior based on the severity and the risk attributed to COVID-19 at the end of phase 1 and the beginning of phase 2 of the pandemic in Mexico. Method. By means of a chain sampling, a comparative study was conducted in which an evaluation battery was disseminated through e-mail and social networks. Results. It was found that evaluating COVID-19 as a serious disease and perceiving oneself as being at risk of contracting it had small and moderate effects on the perception of the consequences of the illness (r = .34; r = .26), emotional impact (r = .32; r = .25), personal control (r = .24) and engagement in preventive (r = .05), and exposure behaviors (r = .07; r = .07). Discussion and conclusion. This article shows the relevance of the perceptual variables that impact concern due to the social and emotional consequences of COVID-19, as well as those that encourage preventive behaviors and the minimization of exposure behavior.

show abstract

“…En el caso de los síntomas depresivos, estos aumentaron de 15% a 28% (Priego-Parra et al, 2020). Por su parte, González- Ramírez et al (2020) identificaron que el 27.7% de su muestra presentó síntomas de Estrés Postraumático durante la segunda fase de la COVID-19 en México. Adicionalmente encontraron que 22% presentó pensamientos intrusivos, 22.3% síntomas evitativos, y 12.2% hiperactivación.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Construcción y Validación del Inventario de Respuestas Emocionales Negativas y Perturbadoras en Contextos de Pandemias (IREN-35) en población mexicana

Flores-Morales

Martínez

Rivas

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La presente investigación tiene como objetivo construir y determinar las propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Respuestas Emocionales Negativas y Perturbadoras en Contextos de Pandemias (IREN-35) en población adulta mexicana. Dicho instrumento identifica la presencia de emociones negativas relacionadas con la exposición directa o indirecta al virus, incluida la experiencia de aislamiento físico y social que éste provoca. Método: Se realizó un estudio exploratorio, descriptivo y transversal con metodología cuantitativa. Con el fin de determinar la validez de constructo, se realizó un análisis factorial exploratorio, así como la identificación de los coeficientes de confiabilidad total y por factores. Para la validación convergente se utilizó un análisis de correlación de Pearson entre el IREN-35 y el Cuestionario General de Salud de Goldberg. El proceso de validación se llevó a cabo durante la pandemia de Covid-19 (coronavirus) en México, en la fase dos de propagación del virus. Resultados: Los resultados globales indican que el IREN-35 es un instrumento válido y confiable para identificar emociones negativas y presenta un buen desempeño psicométrico en población mexicana adulta. El instrumento está constituido por cuatro factores, con un alfa de Cronbach global de .96: 1) Emociones negativas por distanciamiento físico y/o social; 2) Emociones por pérdida de estabilidad o bienestar; 3) Emociones por percepción de amenaza; y 4) Emociones por percepción de peligro intenso. Discusión: El IREN-35 tiene una utilidad preventiva en el sentido de que puede identificar la presencia de emociones perturbadoras, susceptibles de contribuir –con el transcurrir del tiempo y si su intensidad aumenta– en la formación de algún tipo de malestar emocional (factor 1), o trastorno, ya sea depresivo (factor 2), de ansiedad (factor 3), por traumas o factores de estrés (factor 4) en el contexto de una pandemia.

show abstract

<p>Psychological Distress and Signs of Post-Traumatic Stress in Response to the COVID-19 Health Emergency in a Mexican Sample</p>

Cited by 71 publications

References 22 publications

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

Magnitude and determinants of the psychological impact of COVID-19 among health care workers: A systematic review

COVID-19 perception and preventive behaviors: A descriptive, comparative study by severity and perceived risk

Construcción y Validación del Inventario de Respuestas Emocionales Negativas y Perturbadoras en Contextos de Pandemias (IREN-35) en población mexicana

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About